Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  173 / 390 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 173 / 390 Next Page
Page Background

As Equations 9 and 10 from the fluid-dynamic model show, the influence of wall effects

on the bubble rise velocity, relating to the reactors diameter, are already considered. By

replacing the reactor diameter

d

r

with the hydraulic diameter

d

hyd

in Equation 10, the

effect of the internals surfaces can be applied directly to the existing model equations.

In case of a void reactor without internals, the hydraulic diameter corresponds to the

reactors diameter.

Fluid-dynamic model validation results

In order to confirm that the model correctly describes the physical interactions, a model

validation based on experimental data was carried out. For this purpose, fluid-dynamic

data provided from the pilot plant at the TUHH was used. Based on the capacity

measuring probe system the height-dependent validation parameters: bubble fraction

(

İ

b

) bubble size (

d

v

) and bubble rise velocity (

u

b

) are accessible for wide ranges of

operational parameters. Furthermore, discrete pressure-drop measurements along the

dense bed’s height show the axial powder distribution and the fluidized-bed extension.

As an example of the validation results of fluid dynamics, Figure 7 shows a comparison

of the measured and simulated bubble diameters (

d

v

) by means of a parity plot for

different internal configurations (A-D) and for two different superficial velocities (

u

).

Here, the bubble diameters are normalized to the maximum bubble size. As the plot

shows, the fluid-dynamic model corresponds very well to the measured data even for

different internal configurations and gas velocities.

Figure 7

: Model validation results on normalized bubble sizes for different superficial gas velocities

(u1, u2) and internal configurations (A-D)

Modeling particle entrainment

For the Mueller-Rochow reaction and for fluidized-bed reactors in general, the effect

of particle entrainment from the reactor is very significant. The particle entrainment

determines the solid mass flow rate that leaves the reactor with the gaseous product

flow and that has to be separated from the gas flow and recycled to the reactor. Both

the solid separation by means of cyclones and the solids recirculation capacities are

limited by practical considerations. Furthermore, depending on the cyclone’s separation

efficiency, the loss of silicon and therefore the silicon utilization is also affected directly

by the particle entrainment.

165