Background Image
Previous Page  33 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 33 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

33

Position paper - CenSES 1/2015

of buildings can be reduced by about 9 TWh in 2050, compared to the development in the

passive house” in Figure 27).

the analysed scenarios points at some interesting pathways of Norwegian energy use. In the low

the Norwegian industry will be less important from an energy point of view and Norway will be

of clean, renewable energy to Europe. The net electricity export in the low activity scenario is

re than 60 TWh in 2030, compared to the high export year 2012 of 18 TWh, and this could be

ars with high precipitation. Another example of Norway as a commodity exporter is the export

as increased considerable due to the closing down of many pulp and paper plants and if no

egian use is developed, this effect will be enforced in the low activity scenario.

the result of the high activity scenario, where the electricity export is low and the Norwegian

gnificant growth. A combination of implementation of energy efficiency measures, improved

nd a higher Norwegian industry activity, will make it possible to combine a high national activity

ant contribution to balancing intermittent power production in Europe through power

ong business policies with stable framework conditions will probably be necessary to develop

try along the high activity pathway. If energy efficiency measures are implemented along with

ities such as energy labelling, building regulations, energy monitoring including advanced

control systems, the Norwegian energy use can be efficient yet on a high activity level, letting

balancing partner of European power production.

a common interest for energy demand projections has been identified, and the common

orway, presented in this paper, is meant to form a basis for new analysis and studies. The

available in the project report [4]. Even though the future is unsure, and despite the many

the assumptions, the presented reference path for energy demand towards 2050, and the

rios, represent a possible range for development of future energy demand.

on of the impact of some assumptions compared to the energy use of 250 TWh in the reference path in

Figure 27

Illustration of the impact of some assumptions compared to the energy use of

250 TWh in the reference path in 2050 (TWh/year)

compared to the development in the reference path

(“passive house” in Figure 27).

The outcome of the analysed scenarios points at some

interesting pathways of No wegian energy use. In

the low activity scenario the Norwegian industry will

be less important from an energy point of view and

Norway will be a major exporter of clean, renewable

energy to Europe. The net electricity export in the low

activity scenario is calculated to more than 60 TWh

in 2030, compared to the high export year 2012 of

18 TWh, and this could be e en high r in years with

high precipitation. Another example of Norway as a

commodity exporter is the export of timber that has

increased considerable due to the closing down of many

pulp and paper plants and if no alternative Norwegian

use is developed, this effect will be enforced in the low

activity sc nario.

The opposite is the result of the high activity scenario,

where the electricity export is low and the Norwegian

industry has a significant growth. A combination

of implementation of energy efficiency measures,

improved transportation and a higher Norwegian

industry activity, will make it possible to combine a

high national activity with an important contribution

to balancing intermittent power production in Europe

through power connections. Strong business policies

wi h stable framework conditions will probably be

necessary to develop Norwegian industry along the

high activity pathway. If energy efficiency measures

are implemented along with promoting activities

such as energy labelling, building regulations, energy

monitoring including advanced monitoring and control

systems, the Norwegian energy use can be efficient

yet on a h gh activity level, letting Norway act as a

balancing partner of European power production.

Within CenSES a common interest for energy demand

projections has been identified, and the common

projection for Norway, presented in this paper, is

meant to form a basis for new analysis an studies.

The assumptions are available in the project report

[4]. Even though the future is unsure, and despite the

many uncertainties in the assumptions, the presented

reference path for energy demand towards 2050, and

the alternative scenarios, represent a possible range for

development of future energy demand.