Background Image
Previous Page  28 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

Position Paper: CenSES Energy demand projections towards 2050

28

5. Total energy consumption

5.1. Final energy consumption

With the assumptions presented in this paper, the

energy service demand for stationary use increase by

11% in the reference path from 2010 to 2050 and the

energy consumption increase in the same period with

8%, see Table 9. The transportation demand increase

substantially but due to particularly more efficient

technologies, the increase of energy consumption of

transportation is less. For example is the demand for

travelled distance by passenger cars 53% higher in

2050 compared to 2010, but the energy consumption is

reduced by 33% due to more efficient cars.

While electricity consumption the last 15 years has

been at the same level, use of petroleum products has

increased, due to increased transportation. Our analyses

show that the trend of increased use of oil products

will not continue, despite a very strong increase in

transportation demand. With the assumptions used,

the increase in total energy use will be met by an

increased use of biomass and electricity. The increased

electricity consumption of the reference path is almost

the same as in the path of the National Budget of 2011

[2] an increase from 2010 to 2030 of 15 and 13 TWh

respectively.

In the scenario with a possibility to invest in energy

efficiency measures, the increase in total energy use is

decreased to only 5% more than the use of 2010. With

a high activity in industry, the final energy use increase

by 19% at the same time as the electricity consumption

increase by 33%. The opposite is noted in the scenario

with a low industrial activity; final energy use and

electricity use decrease by 8-10%. This means that the

activity level in industry has large impact on both total

energy and electricity use.

In order to illustrate possible outcome of future energy

consumption, different population projections [5] are

combined with the high and low activity scenarios of

industry. The low scenario of Figure 21 and Figure 22

is a combination of the low population projection of

Statistics Norway 2012 (LLML) with the Low activity

scenario earlier described. The high scenario of Figure 21

and Figure 22 is a combination of the high population

projection of Statistics Norway 2012 (HHMH) and the

High activity scenario of this paper. The high population

projection increases the energy consumption of

buildings in 2050 with about 25 TWh more than the

reference path, while the high industrial activity increase

the use by approximately 17 TWh. The low population

projection decreases the energy consumption of

buildings with about 13 TWh in 2050 compared to

a decrease of industry energy use of 15 TWh due to

reduced activity (excl. energy efficiency measures). Final

energy consumption increased by 31 TWh the last 24

years [14] and is calculated to increase by 29 TWh the

next 25 years. The electricity consumption of Figure

22 includes use in district heating plants, but doesn’t

include grid losses. Grid losses are calculated to 13 TWh

in 2050 in the reference path.

5.2. Electricity production

The hydro power production increases in the reference

path by 33 TWh towards 2050, while wind power

production increases by 9 TWh in 2020-2030 and is

back at the present level in 2050. The investments in

wind power are done during the period with electricity

certificates. The net electricity trade increases to 19

TWh in 2030 and is calculated to 14 TWh in 2050 in the

reference path. The wind power production increases

with higher electricity trading prices as in the LOW

activity scenario. If the discount rate is increased

from the 4% used in these analyses, the wind power

production decrease.

The net power trade is strongly dependent on the

exogenously given trading prices. In the LOW activity

scenario the trading prices are the highest at the same

time as the Norwegian electricity use is at the lowest,

and therefore the net trade is highest in this scenario.

But even in the HIGH activity scenario with a substantial

increase in Norwegian industrial activity, the Norwegian

power production is high enough to supply the

demand.