Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  159 / 390 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 159 / 390 Next Page
Page Background

Scheme 2.

Illustration of zero point energy (ZPE) and homolytic cleavage activation

energy (

ǻ

G‡) differences for C-H and C-D bonds. Adopted from an online

publication

(https://www.princeton.edu/chemistry/macmillan/group-meetings/RRK-

KIE.pdf) with modifications. The values for frequency, ZPA and relative rate are

from ref. 17.

Alber studied the direct process with deuterated methyl chloride (CD

3

Cl).

13

In that

study, the direct process reaction was initiated with CH

3

Cl. The feed gas was then

switched back-and-forth between CD

3

Cl and CH

3

Cl. It was observed that switching to

CD

3

Cl drastically decreased production rate and selectivity of MeH, confirming that

its formation involves C-H bond cleavage as the RDS. On the other hand, Me2

production rate and selectivity increased when CD

3

Cl was fed. The increase of Me2

was comparable to the loss of MeH.

13

This observation strongly suggests that the

hydrogen ligands for Si-H formation are generated from the methyl groups which can

also be incorporated into Me2. Therefore, the hydrogen ligand in MeH should be

generated on active sites that also form chlorosilane products. Transferring methyl

groups into Si to form Me2 and cleaving C-H bond to form MeH are two competing

reactions.

On the other hand, feeding CD

3

Cl reduced methane formation but increased ethane

formation.

13

This observation confirms that C-H bond cleavage is also a key

component of the RDS in methane formation. Moreover, methane formation through

reaction 3 is competing with ethane formation through combination of two methyl

groups.

151