Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  200 / 390 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 200 / 390 Next Page
Page Background

and isolated each other so that there is no interaction between them. A larger negative

value, therefore, indicates that the electrons and atomic nuclei are more stabilized by

mutual interaction including formation of chemical bond.

Figure 3

: Total electronic energy plus nuclear repulsive energies between the six models.

The partial cage structure of Models A ~ C is apparently more stable than the twisted

cage of Model D ~ F. The schematically parallel configuration of four Si-Si bonds of

Model A is less stable than the other two orthogonal configurations of Models B and C

in the partial cage group as illustrated in Figure 1. The similar relationship is found

between Model D and Models E and F in the twisted cage group. Model B is the most

stable among the six models and the other models are metastable in the common

potential energy surface.

They may be interpreted in terms of internal structural strain. The structural flexibility

of Si-O-Si bond more or less relaxes the strain and allows the theoretical existence of

all those stereoisomers.

H/OH replacement on the ends of open ring

Two OH groups which terminate both ends (Si atoms) of the open ring of Model A can

be replaced one by one with H atom which is bound to the other Si atom. These

replacements are expected to affect stability of the models, and therefore the structures

of those isomers of Model A were optimized by the same method described in the

previous section and the total electronic energies plus nuclear repulsive energies were

evaluated.

The structures optimized at MP2/6-31G* level are depicted in Figure 4.

192