Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  184 / 390 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 184 / 390 Next Page
Page Background

Figure 9:

Electron micrograph of fracture surface.

The depth of the cracks investigated was from 5 to 11 mm deep, which is consistent

with the expected rate of crack formation for SCC of 1 – 3 mm/year (1). As shown in

Figure 4 to Figure 9, the cracks all share several features:

x

The apparently simultaneous initiation and propagation of multiple cracks at a

given location.

x

Crack propagation with the development of extensive branching.

x

The presence of corrosion products in the crack indicating a chloride salt.

x

A trans-granular cleavage-type fracture surface morphology.

x

Cracks only located in some areas of high internal stress due to forming or

welding

While individually none of these uniquely identify a specific failure mechanism, taken

together they are consistent with stress corrosion cracking as the damage mechanism

or failure mode.

Root Cause

Stress corrosion cracking requires the simultaneous presence of three factors: a

susceptible material (in this case carbon steel), a specific corrosive environment or

agent, and a tensile stress above a certain threshold. Generally, three basic

mechanisms have been identified for stress corrosion cracking (1).

1. Active path dissolution, where the bulk of the material is passive, but

segregation of impurities at the grain boundary results in a susceptible

material. This process can occur in the absence of stress.

2. Hydrogen embrittlement, which occurs where hydrogen is drawn to areas of

stress in the matrix, generally at the grain boundary. In general the reactor

temperature is too low for this mechanism.

3. Film induced cleavage, when a normally ductile material becomes coated with

a brittle film formed by a corrosion process. The ductile surface blunts the

crack, where the brittle film is reformed, progressively expanding to form a

trans-granular fracture.

176