Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  43 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

37

potential for value captured by Norwegian firms. Moreover, innovation in services will be important

to continue cost reductions, in particular in offshore wind.

Finally, while we observe that firms report growth in number of FTEs and turnover, we also observe

that the number of new firms entering OWP and PV has been declining since 2012. Linked to challenges

of small firms and industry size, this may indicate problems with securing sufficiently vibrant

entrepreneurial experimentation in particular in a period of rapid technological development and high

growth in international OWP and PV markets. For PV, intense international competition and the rapid

price drop could however also contribute to explain the declining activity. For OWP, increased activity

in the offshore petroleum industry in 2011-2013 may explain reduced offshore wind activity in the

period (Normann 2015; Weaver & Steen 2013). With the recent decline in the petroleum industry, this

raises the question whether we will see an increase in the number of firms entering OWP for 2015 and

2016.

Summing up, we have some final reflections. The results from this survey lends strength to the

argument that there is considerable potential in the Norwegian offshore wind and photovoltaic

industries, but that both industries experience barriers to internationalisation related to weak

domestic markets. This seems to be particularly true for smaller firms.

Given the dominance of services firms, but also the heterogeneity of firms, and thus variety in needs

within both industries, we think supplementary instruments in addition to support towards R&D are

required. This support could be through demonstration parks or programs, but there may also be other

instruments that help firms to demonstrate and verify products or services. We also think that it would

be worthwhile to investigate further to what extent instruments should be tailored towards specific

parts of the supply chain (i.e. to cater for different demands between industries, between services and

manufacturing, or between different categories in the supply chains). Finally, we see a demand for

strengthening industry collaboration and programs dedicated specifically to help smaller firms link up

with the larger firms, reach international markets and collectively be able to influence their local

framework conditions.