Background Image
Previous Page  49 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 52 Next Page
Page Background

NTNU – THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ART

49

DEVELOPMENT IDEAS

- Integrate the education in technical skills like BIM mod-

elling in courses. This must be done at the right time with

relevance to the current studio work. Quick mandatory

tasks could be one solution.

- More cooperation between the technical/theoretical

subjects and the studio work.

- Smaller tasks for learning of theory and 7.5pt courses

throughout the studies.

- NTNU can help provide placements for the compulsory

internships and encourage employers to give the students

an active role in the office with varied duties and types of

work.

- Organized site visits to building sites, visits to compa-

nies.

- Sustainability should be integrated into the studio work

more often rather than only in seminars.

- Remove grades from courses.

- Forced reflection from day 1 (what does architecture

mean to you?)

- Clearer relationship between the Ark1 through Ark

6 courses and clear development for students to see.

This can be done through reflection and evaluation post

courses.

- NTNU could expand the form & colour subject to learn

about more theory about aesthetics.

- More interdisciplinary subjects/projects.

- More local fieldtrips (firms, factories and buildings).

- Travel to not only beautiful sites and good architecture,

but learn from the mistakes of other architects.

- Material library – an actual shelf with samples of differ-

ent materials that students can look at / feel.

- Workshops/courses in cooperation with other schools to

get new insights and ideas.

- Photography studio could be upgraded so students

use it more. This could include having an online booking

system.

- Allow architecture students to go to other faculty’s

lectures. Make the notifications about interesting lectures

public to let even architecture students get involved.

- Courses where the process is the focus and not only the

result.

- Involve students in political matters – both local and

global.

- The master program should be more linked to real life

projects. Here students can learn about the responsibili-

ties as architects and the consequences they may face.

- The exhibitions of the student work should be more pub-

lic so more people have the chance to see and appreciate

what the students do. An ‘end of year show’ could be an

interesting idea to showcase what the students have been

doing throughout the year and also to see the projects of

different courses. This will give students an opportunity to

see what happens in other courses and help them in their

course choices.

- Make project management and economics a compulso-

ry subject.

- Studios could be improved to provide a better working

environment for students: let students ‘decorate’ the

studios to suit their purpose.

- Thesis related to companies (support).

- More time for individual feedback during evaluations.

- Teachers and lectures with multiple backgrounds (dou-

ble degrees).

- Use more simulation tools

- Flexibility when choosing courses- according to individ-

ual lack of knowledge. Allow everyone the opportunity to

choose the courses they want/need to take.

- Opportunities to write reports together with Sintef and

ZEB.

- Courses should have a clearer structure/schedule and

show who is responsible for what part of each course if

people need to contact someone/have questions.

- All students should have a stable working environment

and a place to be at all times.

- Sustainability students would like to have a more clear

focus on design for some courses.

- Clarify the title MA and MSC, do the Sustainability stu-

dents classify as architects, if not why is there no A in the

title?

- MSC students: Possibility to take courses outside the

program.

- MSC students: Minimum requirements/skills should be

enforced in order to apply for our ‘in-courses’.