Background Image
Previous Page  19 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

CenSES annual report 2014

19

Figure 2 shows a stylized representation of welfare cost esti-

mates. It is not as if car buyers are viewed as being interested

in CO

2

intensity in itself, but rather that CO

2

intensity makes it

easier for car-makers to provide qualities users want: horse-

powers, size, etc. When raising the CO

2

related feebate by 50

percent, government revenue rises by D minus B, and the

welfare cost of the ten percent decarbonization is E. The study

draws in part on work done earlier in cooperation withTOI.

The study aims to recover how this transformation of the

vehicle eet is accomplished: to what extent are consumers

sacri cing qualities they cherish; to what extent are makers

pushed to provide these qualities by other means than

through CO

2

?

contractor can take steps such as getting panels professionally

inspected and visiting panel factories. In this way, contractors

can aggregate and control the risk of poor panel quality,

allowing for the large-scale use of Chinese-produced panels.

In turn, costs were reduced and adoption of panel systems

was increased.

These results have implications for understanding the rapidly

emerging solar power industry and in turn informing regu-

lations and public policy. For example, California’s subsidy

scheme for solar panels provided grants to investors of solar

power systems, but did not specify that the owner of the

solar panels also needed to be the home owner. This exibil-

ity allowed for the innovation of a leasing business model to

take hold.

The study accompanies broader studies along two lines.

In one, covering all transport, it is highlighted that each

‘vehicle mile’ – whether aviation, by ship, etc – can be decar-

bonized in ways such as these, but that other responses must

be allowed to accompany them. Some common features are

that decarbonization economies accompany:

• scale economies in‘vehicle size’: bus carbon-leaner than car

• capacity utilization: full car leaner than empty bus

• speed: slow movements leaner than fast

• hybridization: under variable loads, combined engine

con gurations leaner than singular.

In another, urban development and mobility is examined,

pushing the question of public transport’s relation to city size

and density. This study challenges conventional wisdom on

charging for emissions and congestion, showing that such

charges may have to be tailored not to block agglomeration

bene ts, especially in poor cities. The part of conventional

wisdom that is retained is dense development along high-

capacity transportation corridors.

gCO2/km

t=161 USD/g CO2/vkm

t=108 USD/g CO2/vkm

D

Marginal cost without CO2 cost

10%

CO2-tax kr/g/vkm

D

A

B

CO2-emission for cars that were chosen without CO2 tax

C

E

C

Post doc

Johannes Mauritzen

Figure 2