Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  50 / 53 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 53 Next Page
Page Background

18

story

Solid may be

DANGEROUS

In the US, they construct huge buildings for the sole purpose

of studying the effects of massive impacts. A time-consuming

and costly procedure. In Norway, other methods are chosen.

A decades-long cooperation between the Norwegian Defence

Estates Agency (NDEA), a growing number of industrial partners

and NTNU has carried SIMLab to a world-leading position in

the design of crashworthy and protective structures. When the

research group was awarded another eight year programme,

SFI CASA, the Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation

decided to join as partners. Deputy director general Christian

Fredrik Horst at the Department for Buildings, Security and

Services explains why:

“We need an environment that can find the structural solutions

for the objects we are going to build. This includes the capacity

to simulate with a high level of precision how impacts affect

whole structures, what fragments do to them, how resilient they

are and so on. We need to be certain that they can handle an

impact. Concluding afterwards that they didn’t is not an option.”

NOT FOR SALE

“Can’t you just buy this knowledge abroad?”

“We have experienced more than once that this kind of expertise

is much more accessible if we have some competence of our

own to offer in exchange. Our partnership gives us access to

the international expert network CASA is part of. The value of

this should not be underestimated.”

“You already cooperate closely with NDEA and the Norwegian

National Security Agency, another CASA partner. Wouldn’t it

work just as well getting the results from them?”

“We could and do get results from them. In fact, we rely heavily

on their expertise and we specifically do not have any ambition

to carry out research in this field on our own. However, we are

constantly challenged by our suppliers on the specifications of

our orders. Statsbygg, which is also part of our ministry, will

be the formal commissioner of the government administration

complex. Along with us, they will have to draw on advice from

a number of expert groups, including the military services and

the police.

We obviously don’t want the buildings to look like fortresses.

This means that we will be on constant lookout for vulnerable

areas, compensatory measures and so on. This is where CASA

is so valuable. They will be able to provide us with much more

accurate information about what is needed than we would have

had otherwise. We need to approach this from a scientific point

of view.”

PHD PROJECTS COMING UP

“Does this also mean that you see the need for specific PhD

projects linked directly to your needs?”

“Certainly. There is a need for basic research for instance

concerning what materials to use where. We also expect that

the increased expertise will save us a lot of money. As an

example, we reduce the risk of building something much more

solid and expensive than necessary.

Furthermore, CASA will produce a lot of students with more

expertise and closer attention to this area than would have

happened otherwise. This is useful both to the ministry and to

society as a whole,” Horst says.

The plan is for the administration complex to be finished in ten

years’ time. Three years ago the price tag was estimated at NOK

five billion upwards. Since then it has increased considerably.

HISTORIC BROADCAST

A news broadcast on Norway’s state channel NRK from 2006

will sit in many people’s memory as long as they live. It opens

with the following words:

“The obstructions outside the high-rise in the government

administration aren’t exactly deterring. Anyone can place a car

full of explosives in front of the government building.”

Five years later, on 22 July 2011, that is exactly what terrorist

Anders Behring Breivik did.

The broadcast was only aired locally in 2006. After the attack

it became known to the whole nation. It contained an interview

with Christian Fredrik Horst where he presented the result of a

risk analysis, concluding that the street in front of the building

needed to be closed to public traffic. As we all know, nothing

happened. Protests sent the plans on a journey that still hadn’t

finished in 2011.

“WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED?”

“Above all that the unthinkable isn’t unthinkable and that

the time factor is crucial. The challenges posed by varying

proposals, solution procedures and so on are massive and

demand cooperation on a scale nobody had foreseen.”

Bullet proof windows don’t help much if the whole building

comes down on you. Obvious? Sure, and it is one of the classic dilemmas facing the people

who plan the new government administration complex in Oslo.