Litteratur

Academic research into the BBC micro:bit. (2019). https://microbit.org/research/

Aho, A. V. (2012). Computation and Computational Thinking. The Computer Journal, 55(7), 832–835. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxs074

Akpinar, Y., & Aslan, Ü. (2015). Supporting Children’s Learning of Probability Through Video Game Programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 228–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115598492

Alqahtani, M. M., Hall, J. A., Leventhal, M., & Argila, A. N. (2022). Programming in Mathematics Classrooms: Changes in Pre-service Teachers’ Intentions to Integrate Robots in Teaching. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8(1), 70–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-021-00096-6

Altadmri, A., & Brown, N. C. C. (2015). 37 Million Compilations: Investigating Novice Programming Mistakes in Large-Scale Student Data. Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677258

Andersen, R., Mørch, A. I., & Litherland, K. (2021). Learning Domain Knowledge using Block-Based Programming: Design-Based Collaborative Learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79840-6_8

Apriliana, L. L., Lopez-Guede, J. M., Estevez, J., & Grana, M. (2020). Using Scratch to Teach Undergraduate Students Skills on AI. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/x24m6

Ardito, G., Mosley, P., & Scollins, L. (2014). Using Robotics to Promote Collaborative and Mathematics Learning in a Middle School Classroom. 9(3), 17.

Armoni, M., Meerbaum-Salant, O., & Ben-Ari, M. (2015). From Scratch to “Real” Programming. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(4), 25:1-25:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677087

Association, P. (2014, juni 9). Computer simulating 13-year-old boy becomes first to pass Turing test. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/08/super-computer-simulates-13-year-old-boy-passes-turing-test

Austin, J., Baker, H., Ball, T., Devine, J., Finney, J., Halleux, P. de, Hodges, S., Moskal, M., & Stockdale, G. (2020). The BBC micro:bit: From the U.K. to the world. Communications of the ACM, 63(3). https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/the-bbc-microbit-from-the-u-k-to-the-world/

Aydin, E. (2005a). The Use of Computers in Mathematics Education: A Paradigm Shift fro (Bd. 4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED502604

Aydin, E. (2005b). The Use of Computers in Mathematics Education: A Paradigm Shift from «Computer Assisted Instruction» towards «Student Programming». Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 4(2), 27–34.

Balacheff, N., & Kaput, J. J. (1997). Computer-based learning environment in mathematics. I A. Bischop (Red.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education (s. 469–501). Kluwer Academic publisher. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01775249

Balanskat, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2015). Computing our future: Computer programming and coding - Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe.

Bamberger, J. (2015). A Brief History of Music, Computers and Thinking: 1972–2015. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-015-0003-3

Barcelos, T., Munoz, R., Villarroel, R., Merino, E., & Silveira, I. (2018). Mathematics Learning through Computational Thinking Activities: A Systematic Literature Review. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 24, 815.

Barefoot Computing. (n.d.). Barefoot Computing. https://www.barefootcomputing.org, https://www.barefootcomputing.org/

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905

BBC. (2019a). BBC Bitesize—KS3 Computer Science—Introduction to computational thinking. BBC Bitesize. https://www.bbc.com/bitesize/guides/zp92mp3/revision/1

BBC. (2019b). Computational thinking—OCR - Revision 1—GCSE Computer Science. BBC Bitesize. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/z4rbcj6/revision/1

BECTA. (2003). What the research says about ICT in maths (What the Research Says, s. 4). Becta. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/15014MIG2799.pdf

Beecher, K. (2017). Computational Thinking: A Beginner’s Guide to Problem-Solving and Programming. BCS.

Benton, L., Hoyles, C., Kalas, I., & Noss, R. (2016). Building mathematical knowledge with programming: Insights from the ScratchMaths project. 26–33.

Benton, L., Hoyles, C., Kalas, I., & Noss, R. (2017). Bridging Primary Programming and Mathematics: Some Findings of Design Research in England. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0028-x

Benton, L., Kalas, I., Saunders, P., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2018). Beyond jam sandwiches and cups of tea: An exploration of primary pupils’ algorithm-evaluation strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 590–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12266

Benton, L., Saunders, P., Kalas, I., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2018). Designing for learning mathematics through programming: A case study of pupils engaging with place value. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.12.004

Bjørnevoll, E. (2016). Hva kan skolen lære av kodeklubbene? https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2427915

Bocconi, S., & Chioccariello, A. (2018). The Nordic Approach to Introducing Computational Thinking and Programming in Compulsory Education. https://www.itd.cnr.it/doc/CompuThinkNordic.pdf

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. 25.

Brown, N. C. C., & Wilson, G. (2018). Ten quick tips for teaching programming. PLOS Computational Biology, 14(4), e1006023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006023

Bråting, K., & Kilhamn, C. (2020). Exploring the intersection of algebraic and computational thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1779012

Bråting, K., Kilhamn, C., & Rolandsson, L. (2020). Integrating programming in Swedish school mathematics: Description of a research project. I Sustainable mathematics education in a digitalized World: Proceedings of MADIF 12 (s. 11).

Bungum, B., & Sanne, A. (2021). Conditions for the Active Involvement of Teachers in a Design-Based Research Project. Designs for Learning, 13(1), Artikkel 1. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.169

Busuttil, L., & Formosa, M. (2020). Teaching Computing without Computers: Unplugged Computing as a Pedagogical Strategy. Informatics in Education, 19(4), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.25

Buteau, C., Muller, E., Mgombelo, J., Sacristán, A. I., & Dreise, K. (2020). Instrumental Genesis Stages of Programming for Mathematical Work. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6(3), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00060-w

Buteau, C., Sacristán, A. I., & Santacruz-Rodríguez, M. (2020). The constructionist nature of an instructor’s instrumental orchestration of programming for mathematics, at university level. Proceedings of the 2020 Constructionism Conference. https://www.academia.edu/43325269/The_constructionist_nature_of_an_instructor_s_instrumental_orchestration_of_programming_for_mathematics_at_university_level

Børre, S., & Odd Tore, K. (2024). Algoritmer. tangenten, 34(4), 13–16.

Calder, N. (2010). Using Scratch: An Integrated Problem-Solving Approach to Mathematical Thinking. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(4), 9–14.

Cansu, F., & Cansu, S. (2019). An Overview of Computational Thinking. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i1.53

Carlson, D. (2004). The Teaching and Learning of Tertiary Algebra. I K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Red.), The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra The 12thICMI Study (s. 293–309). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8131-6_11

Carpenter, T. P., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking Mathematically: Integrating Arithmetic & Algebra in Elementary School. Heinemann.

Cateté, V., Lytle, N., Dong, Y., Boulden, D., Akram, B., Houchins, J., Barnes, T., Wiebe, E. N., Lester, J. C., Mott, B. W., & Boyer, K. (2018). Infusing computational thinking into middle grade science classrooms: Lessons learned. WiPSCE. https://doi.org/10.1145/3265757.3265778

Cavallo, F., & Favilli, E. (2017). Nattafortellinger for rebelske jenter. Cappelen Damm AS. https://www.norli.no/nattafortellinger-for-rebelske-jenter-2-1

Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049

Cibes, M., & Greenwood, J. (2007). Media Clips. The Mathematics Teacher, 100(6), 433–435. JSTOR.

Clarke, V. A. (1986). The Impact of Computers on Mathematics Abilities and Attitudes: A Pilot Study Using Logo. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 5(2), 32–33.

Clark-Wilson, A., Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Benton, L. (2019, februar). Key Factors for Successfully Embedding a Programming Approach to the Primary Maths Curriculum at Scale. 11th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Utrecht, Netherlands. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330984566_Key_Factors_for_Successfully_Embedding_a_Programming_Approach_to_the_Primary_Maths_Curriculum_at_Scale

Clements, D. H. (2002). Computers in Early Childhood Mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 160–181.

Clements, D. H., & Gulo, D. (1984). Effects of computer programming on young children’s cognition. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://www.academia.edu/2773293/Effects_of_computer_programming_on_young_childrens_cognition

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (1997a). Research on Logo. Computers in the Schools, 14(1–2), 9–46.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (1997b). Research on Logo: A Decade of Progress | Investigations in Number, Data, and Space®. http://investigations.terc.edu/library/bookpapers/research_on_logo.cfm

Cortina, T. J. (2015). Reaching a broader population of students through «unplugged» activities. Communications of the ACM, 58(3), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723671

Dağ, F. (2019). Prepare pre-service teachers to teach computer programming skills at K-12 level: Experiences in a course. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(2), 277–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00137-5

Dasgupta, S. (2013). Surveys, collaborative art and virtual currencies: Children programming with online data. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1(3), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.02.003
DeJarnette, A. F. (2019). Students’ Challenges with Symbols and Diagrams when Using a Programming Environment in Mathematics. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 5(1), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-018-0044-5
Denning, P. J. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998438
Dickson, B. A., Kotsopoulos, D., & Harris, L. (2022). The Use of Coding Clubs to Develop Middle-School Students’ Spatial Reasoning Abilities. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00099-x
diSessa, A. A. (2018). Computational Literacy and “The Big Picture” Concerning Computers in Mathematics Education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403544
Dohn, N. B. (2020). Students’ interest in Scratch coding in lower secondary mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12759
Durmus, S., & Karakirik, E. (2005). An Alternative Approach to Logo-Based Geometry (Bd. 4). https://eric.ed.gov/?q=logo&ff1=subElementary+School+Mathematics&id=ED495545
Edwards, N. T., & And Others. (1990). Teaching Mathematics with Technology. Arithmetic Teacher, 37(6), 64–67.
Elbahan, H., Elbahan, M. H., & Balbağ, M. Z. (2023). Determining the Level of Computational Thinking Skills of Science Teacher Candidates. Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research, 10 (Special Issue), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.59409/ojer.1369711
Elicer, R., Tamborg, A. L., Bråting, K., & Kilhamn, C. (2023). Comparing the integration of programming and computational thinking into Danish and Swedish elementary mathematics curriculum resources. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), Artikkel 3. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.3.1940
Ely, R., & Adams, A. E. (2012). Unknown, placeholder, or variable: What is x? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0029-9
Enge, O., & Buan, A. B. (2004). Kryptografi i skolen. Tangenten, 15(3), 8–11.
Erol, O., & Kurt, A. A. (2017). The effects of teaching programming with scratch on pre-service information technology teachers’ motivation and achievement. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.017
European Mathematical Society. (2011). Position Paper of the European Mathematical Society on the European Commission’s contributions to European Reasearch: Executive summary. http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/pdf/contributions/post/european_organisations/european_mathematical_society.pdf
European Schoolnet. (2015). Computing our future. Computer programming and coding. Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. (s. 90). http://www.eun.org/documents/411753/817341/Computing+our+future_final_2015.pdf/d3780a64-1081-4488-8549-6033200e3c03
Eyster, R. H. (1981). Seymour Papert and the Logo Universe. Creative Computing, 7(12).
Falkner, N., Vivian, R., Piper, D., & Falkner, K. (2014). Increasing the effectiveness of automated assessment by increasing marking granularity and feedback units. Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538896
Falloon, G. (2016). An analysis of young students’ thinking when completing basic coding tasks using Scratch Jnr. On the iPad. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12155
Feurzeig, W., Papert, S., Bloom, M., & Grant, R. (1969). PROGRAMMING-LANGUAGES AS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING MATHEMATICS. 5.
Fey, J. T. (1989). Technology and mathematics education: A survey of recent developments and important problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(3), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310873
Finger, G., & Houguet, B. (2009). Insights into the intrinsic and extrinsic challenges for implementing technology education: Case studies of Queensland teachers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9044-2
Flø, E. E. (2020). Kobling A. Kreativ programmering med micro:bit (1. utg). GAN Aschehoug.
Flø, E. E. (2021). Programmering i LK20. tangenten, 32(1), 3–9.
Forsström, S. E., & Kaufmann, O. T. (2019). A Literature Review Exploring the use of Programming in Mathematics Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(12). http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/1297

Francis, K., & Davis, B. (2017). Number, arithmetic, multiplicative thinking and coding. Proceedings of CERME10, 2547–2554.

Francis, K., & Davis, B. (2018). Coding Robots as a Source of Instantiations for Arithmetic. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 4(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-018-0042-7

Francis, K., Khan, S., & Davis, B. (2016). Enactivism, Spatial Reasoning and Coding. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-015-0010-4

Futschek, G. (2006). Algorithmic Thinking: The Key for Understanding Computer Science. I R. T. Mittermeir (Red.), Informatics Education – The Bridge between Using and Understanding Computers (s. 159–168). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11915355_15

Gadanidis, G., Cendros, R., Floyd, L., & Namukasa, I. (2017). Computational Thinking in Mathematics Teacher Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE Journal), 17(4).

Gazoni, R. M. (2018). A Semiotic Analysis of Programming Languages. Journal of Computer and Communications, 6(3), Artikkel 3. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2018.63007

Gibson, J. P. (2012). Teaching graph algorithms to children of all ages. 34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325296.2325308

Gilbert, A., Bloomquist, D., & Czerniak, C. M. (2016). Using Mathematical and Computational Thinking in Early Grades Science Classrooms: The Need for High-Quality Professional Development. School Science and Mathematics, 116(4), 175–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12174

Gjøvik, Ø. (2015). Logo—Fram fra glemselen! Tangenten, 26(3), 23–28.

Gjøvik, Ø., & Torkildsen, H. A. (2019). Algoritmisk tenkning. Tangenten, 3, 31–37.

Glasgow, J. I., Jenkins, M. A., & Hendren, L. J. (1986). A programming language for learning environments. Computational Intelligence, 2(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1986.tb00072.x
Gonick, L. (1983). The Cartoon Guide to Computer Science (1st edition). Barnes & Noble.
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
Guin, D., Ruthven, K., & Trouche, L. (Red.). (2005). The Didactical Challenge of Symbolic Calculators: Turning a Computational Device into a Mathematical Instrument. Springer US. //www.springer.com/us/book/9780387231587
Hagge, J. (2018). Coding to Create: A Subtext of Decisions as Early Adolescents Design Digital Media. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9359-y
Hannay, J. E., Dybå, T., Arisholm, E., & Sjøberg, D. I. K. (2009). The effectiveness of pair programming: A meta-analysis. Information and Software Technology, 51(7), 1110–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.02.001
Haraldsrud, A. (2020). Blokkprogrammering. I Programmering i skolen (1. utg., s. 87–104).

Hazzan, O., Lapidot, T., & Ragonis, N. (2011). Guide to Teaching Computer Science: An Activity-Based Approach. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-443-2
Heim, G., & Wang, O. J. (2023). Block and unplugged programming can be mutually beneficial: A study of learning activities in a 6th grade class in Norway. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1138285
Hickmott, D., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., & Holmes, K. (2018). A Scoping Review of Studies on Computational Thinking in K–12 Mathematics Classrooms. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0038-8
Holmes, K., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., Hickmott, D., & Berger, N. (2018). Using coding to teach mathematics: Results of a pilot project. Integrated Education for the Real World: 5th International STEM in Education Conference: Post-Conference Proceedings, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 21st to 23rd November 2018, 152–158.
Horwitz, P. (2002). Instructivism: Between CAI and Microworlds. EU/US Sintra Meeting.
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992a). A Logo Microworld for Transformation Geometry. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0012
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (1992b). A pedagogy for mathematical microworlds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302313
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992c). Avoiding Recursion. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0024
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992d). Between Logo and Mathematics: A Road of Tunnels and Bridges. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0018
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992e). Conceptually Defined Turtles. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0010
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992f). Index. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0028
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992g). Introduction to Part I. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0007
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992h). Introduction to Part II. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0014
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992i). Introduction to Part III. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0020
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992j). Introduction to Part IV. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0026
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992k). Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.001.0001
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (1992l). Learning mathematics and logo. MIT Press. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10001715/
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992m). LEGO-Logo: A Vehicle for Learning. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0015
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992n). Looking Back and Looking Forward. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0027
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992o). Mathematics in a Logo Environment A Recursive Look at a Complex Phenomenon. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0017
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992p). Of Geometry, Turtles, and Groups. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0022
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992q). On Intra- and Interindividual Differences in Children’s Learning Styles. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0016
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992r). Patterns, Permutations, and Groups. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0023
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992s). Processes: A Dynamical Integration of Computer Science into Mathematical Education. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0021
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992t). The Notion of Variable in the Context of Turtle Graphics. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0008
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992u). The Turtle Metaphor as a Tool for Children’s Geometry. I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0011
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (Red.). (1992v). What Is Algebraic about Programming in Logo? I Learning Mathematics and Logo. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4171.003.0009
Husain, H., Kamal, N., Ibrahim, M. F., Huddin, A. B., & Alim, A. A. (2017). Engendering problem solving skills and mathematical knowledge via programming. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 12, 1–11.
Høyland, J. (2021). Algebra fra Scratch—En studie av elevers arbeid med programmering i algebraundervisning, med fokus på generalisering og variabler. [Masteroppgave]. NTNU.
Informatics in schools: Focus on learning programming. (2017). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Iversen, S. (2015). Koding som digital grublis. En kvalitativ studie om hvordan elevenes læringsstrategier påvirkes gjennom programmering. https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/8089
Jacob, S. R., Warschauer, M., University of California, I., & University of California, I. (2018). Computational Thinking and Literacy. Journal of Computer Science Integration, 1(1). https://www.academia.edu/37928243/Computational_Thinking_and_Literacy
Jonsson, B., Norqvist, M., Liljekvist, Y., & Lithner, J. (2014). Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.08.003
Kaput, J. J., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (2002). Developing nre notations for a learnable mathematics in the computational era. I Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (s. 51–75). Lawrence Erlabum associate Publishers.
Karel (programming language). (2019). I Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karel_(programming_language)&oldid=893062892
Kaufmann, O. T., & Stenseth, B. (2020). Programming in mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1736349
Kenwright, B. (2017). Brief review of video games in learning & education how far we have come. SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Symposium on Education, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134368.3139220
Kieran, C., & Yerushalmy, M. (2004). Research on the Role of Technological Environments in Algebra Learning and Teaching. I K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Red.), The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra The 12thICMI Study (s. 97–152). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8131-6_6
Kilhamn, C., & Bråting, K. (2019). Algebraic thinking in the shadow of programming. I U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Red.), Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (Bd. TWG03, Nummer 7). Freudenthal Group. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02429028
Kjällander, S., Åkerfeldt, A., Mannila, L., & Parnes, P. (2018). Makerspaces Across Settings: Didactic Design for Programming in Formal and Informal Teacher Education in the Nordic Countries. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1387831
Kordaki, M. (2012). Diverse Categories of Programming Learning Activities could be Performed within Scratch. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1162–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.267
Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A Pedagogical Framework for Computational Thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0031-2
Kristjánsdóttir, A. (2005). Er laborative midler gavnlige? Tangenten, 4, 11–17.
Kröger, F. (u.å.). Formalization of algorithmic reasoning. Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität Munchen.
Kunz, S., & Hess, C. (2024). How to Catch’em All: Designing Attractive Learning Activities for Girls in Computer Science: A Systematic Framework. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.10.1.51-58

Kynigos, C., & Grizioti, M. (u.å.). Programming Approaches to Computational Thinking: Integrating Turtle Geometry, Dynamic Manipulation and 3D Space. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 321–340.
Kynigos, C., & Zantzos, I. (2017). Constructing the shortest path on a cylindrical surface. CERME10, Dublin, Ireland. https://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5118/pdf/CERME10_0386.pdf
Kynogis, C., Birbilis, G., Grizioti, M., & Mantes, T. (2016). MALT2—’Machine Lab Turtlesphere’ [Educational Technology Lab (NKUOA), Unity]. https://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5118/pdf/CERME10_0386.pdf
Lang-Ree, H. L. (2016). «Vi må tenke og ikke bare tegne»: En kvalitativ studie om bruk av programmering som verktøy i arbeid med matematikk [Masteroppgave, NTNU]. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2396148
LaPensée, E., Weitze, C., Homer, B., Becker, K., Simkins, D., Haskell, S., Jasko, L., Paul Darvasi, P., & Schrier, K. (u.å.). Learning, Education and Games. Volume One. Henta 23. mai 2022, frå https://www.academia.edu/24296760/Learning_Education_and_Games_Volume_One
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). On Computational Thinking and STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00044-w
Lie, J., Hauge, I. O., & Meaney, T. J. (2017). Computer programming in the lower secondary classroom: Learning mathematics. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), Artikkel 2. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/911
Limke, A., Lytle, N., Mahmoud, S., Lin, M., Hill, M., Cateté, V., & Barnes, T. (2023). Participatory Design with Teachers for Block-Based Learning with SnapClass. 2023 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL-HCC57772.2023.00028

Læreplan i matematikk fellesfag 1.-10. Trinn. (2019). Udir. https://hoering.udir.no/Hoering/v2/343?notatId=686

Mannila, L., Dagiene, V., Demo, B., Grgurina, N., Mirolo, C., Rolandsson, L., & Settle, A. (2014). Computational Thinking in K-9 Education. Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2713609.2713610

Markuson, C., & And Others. (1983). Logo Fever: The Computer Language Every School Is Catching. Arithmetic Teacher, 31(1), 48–51.

Martínez Ortiz, A. (2015). Examining Students’ Proportional Reasoning Strategy Levels as Evidence of the Impact of an Integrated LEGO Robotics and Mathematics Learning Experience. Journal of Technology Education, 26(2), 46–69.

Massachusetts institute of technology. (2019). Scratch—Imagine, Program, Share. https://scratch.mit.edu/

Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. - PsycNET. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–437.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
McDonald, C. (2018). Why Is Teaching Programming Difficult? I J. Carter, M. O’Grady, & C. Rosen (Red.), Higher Education Computer Science (s. 75–93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98590-9_6
McPherson, R. F. 1, mcphersonrf@longwood. edu, & Tyson, V., vtyson@uvi. edu. (2006). Creating Your Own Interactive Computer-Based Algebra Teaching Tools: A No Programming Zone. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 6(2), 293–301.
Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (Moti). (2013). Learning computer science concepts with Scratch. Computer Science Education, 23(3), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2013.832022
Melby-Lervåg, M. (2018). Er det lurt å “lære kidsa koding” i skolen? Ny kunnskapsoppsummering. Utdanningsforskning. http://utdanningsforskning.no/artikler/er-det-lurt-a-lare-kidsa-koding-i-skolen-ny-kunnskapsoppsummering/
Michaeli, T., & Romeike, R. (2019). Improving Debugging Skills in the Classroom: The Effects of Teaching a Systematic Debugging Process. Proceedings of the 14th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361721.3361724
Michayluk, J. O. (1986). LOGO: More than a decade later. British Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.1986.tb00495.x
Misfeldt, M., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2015). Learning mathematics through programming: An instrumental approach to potentials and pitfalls. 2524–2530. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01289367
Misfeldt, M., Szabo, A., & Helenius, O. (2019). Surveying teachers’ conception of programming as a mathematics topic following the implementation of a new mathematics curriculum. I U. T. Jankvist, M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Red.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (s. 2713–2720). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
Mohr, D. J. (2008). Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Make Connections between Geometry and Algebra through the Use of Technology. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=logo&ff1=subElementary+School+Mathematics&id=EJ835508
Morten, M. (2023). Programmering og diskusjon. tangenten, 34(4), 9–12.
Mozelius, P., Ulfenborg, M., & Persson, N. (2019). TEACHER ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE INTEGRATION OF PROGRAMMING IN MIDDLE SCHOOL MATHEMATICS. 701–706. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.0249
Muhammad, I., Rusyid, H. K., Maharani, S., & Angraini, L. M. (2023). Computational Thinking Research in Mathematics Learning in the Last Decade: A Bibliometric Review. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3086
National Centre for Computing Education. (2020). Pedagogy Quick Reads: Improving program comprehension through Parson’s Problems. Raspberry Pi. https://raspberrypi-education.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/Quick+Reads/Pedagogy+Quick+Read+13+-+Parson's+Problems.pdf
Niess, M. L. (1988). Logo Learning Tools and Motion Geometry. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 8(1), 17–24.
Nordby, S. K., Bjerke, A. H., & Mifsud, L. (2022). Computational Thinking in the Primary Mathematics Classroom: A Systematic Review. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00102-5
Noss, R. (1987). How do children do mathematics with LOGO? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 3(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1987.tb00303.x
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on Mathematical Meanings: Learning Cultures and Computers. Springer Science & Business Media.
Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Saunders, P., Clark-Wilson, A., Benton, L., & Kalas, I. (2020). Making Constructionism Work at Scale: The Story Of Scratchmaths. I N. Holbert, M. Berland, & Y. Kafai (Red.), In: Holbert, N and Berland, M and Kafai, Y, (eds.) Designing Constructionist Futures: The Art, Theory, and Practice of Learning Designs. (Pp. 39-52).  MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. (2020) (s. 39–52). MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/designing-constructionist-futures#preview
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street Mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
Nygård, K. (Red.). (2018). Programmering i skolen. Pedlex. http://www.pedlex.no/artikkel/ps17/programmering-i-skolen/
Oldfield, J., & Oldfield, C. (1985). A Logo Lesson. Mathematics in School, 14(4), 10–11.
Palmér, H. (2017). Programming in Preschool—With a Focus on Learning Mathematics. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 8(1), 75–87.
Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2018). Using Gamification for Supporting an Introductory Programming Course. The Case of ClassCraft in a Secondary Education Classroom. I A. L. Brooks, E. Brooks, & N. Vidakis (Red.), Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation (s. 366–375). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76908-0_35
Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2019). Exploring children’s learning experience in constructionism-based coding activities through design-based research. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.008
Papert, S., & Solomon, C. (1972). Twenty things to do with a computer. Educational Technology, 248.
Peppler, K. (2011). Youth, Technology, and DIY: Developing Participatory Competencies in Creative Media Production. In Book: Youth Cultures, Language, and Literacy, Chapter: 4, Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc., Editors: V.L. Gadsden, Stanton Wortham, R. Lukose, Pp.89-119. https://www.academia.edu/6989718/Youth_Technology_and_DIY_Developing_Participatory_Competencies_in_Creative_Media_Production
Peppler, K. (2012). Developing Gaming Fluencies with Scratch: Realizing Game Design as an Artistic Process. In Book: Games, Learning, and Society: Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age, Publisher: Cambridge University Press, Editors: C. Steinkuehler, K. Squire, S. Barab. https://www.academia.edu/8078654/Developing_Gaming_Fluencies_with_Scratch_Realizing_Game_Design_as_an_Artistic_Process
Pollard, S., & Duvall, R. C. (2006). Everything I Needed to Know About Teaching I Learned in Kindergarten: Bringing Elementary Education Techniques to Undergraduate Computer Science Classes. 5.
Popat, S., & Starkey, L. (2019). Learning to code or coding to learn? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 128, 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.005
Programmering i grundskolan – bra eller dåligt? (2014, mai 18). Teknikveckan. https://teknikveckan.com/nyheter/programmering-i-grundskolan-bra-eller-daligt/
Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. (2017). Students’ Misconceptions and Other Difficulties in Introductory Programming: A Literature Review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 18(1), 1:1-1:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077618
Rangnes, T. E. (2006). Nettsted til hygge og nytte! Tangenten, 2, 43–44.
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
Rich, P. J., Bly, N., & Leatham, K. R. (2014). Beyond Cognitive Increase: Investigating the Influence of Computer Programming on Perception and Application of Mathematical skills. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33(1), 103–128.
Rieber, L. P. (2005). Multimedia Learning in Games, Simulations, and Microworlds. I R. E. Mayer (Red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. http://lrieber.coe.uga.edu/mayer2005/
Riley, D., & Hunt, K. (2014). Computational Thinking for the Modern Problem Solver. https://www.crcpress.com/Computational-Thinking-for-the-Modern-Problem-Solver/Riley-Hunt/p/book/9781466587779
Rivers, K., & Koedinger, K. R. (2013). Automatic Generation of Programming Feedback: A Data-Driven Approach. 10.
Ryder, J. (2015). Being professional: Accountability and authority in teachers’ responses to science curriculum reform. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.1001629
Sáez-López, J.-M., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
Sanford, J. F., & Naidu, J. T. (2016). Computational Thinking Concepts for Grade School. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 9(1), 23–33.
Sanne, A., Berge, O., Bungum, B., Jørgensen, E. C., Kluge, A., Kristensen, T. E., Mørken, K. M., Svorkmo, A.-G., & Voll, L. O. (2016). Teknologi og programmering for alle: En faggjennomgang med forslag til endringer i grunnopplæringen—August 2016. Utdanningsdirektoratet. http://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/tall-og-forskning/forskningsrapporter/teknologi-og-programmering-for-alle.pdf
Santos, R. P. dos. (2014). TATI -- A Logo-like interface for microworlds and simulations for physics teaching in Second Life. arXiv:1405.6334 [physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.6334
Savard, A., & Highfield, K. (2015). Teachers’ talk about Robotics: Where is the Mathematics? 7.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Sánchez Viveros, B. (2018). The cognitive benefits of learning computer programming: A meta-analysis of transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000314
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Sánchez Viveros, B. (2020). A meta-analysis of teaching and learning computer programming: Effective instructional approaches and conditions. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106349
Schmittau, J. (2003). Cultural-Historical Theory and Mathematics Education. I Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.013
Sentance, S., Waite, J., Hodges, S., MacLeod, E., & Yeomans, L. (2017). «Creating Cool Stuff»: Pupils’ Experience of the BBC micro:bit. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017749
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Sirkiä, T., & Sorva, J. (2012). Exploring programming misconceptions: An analysis of student mistakes in visual program simulation exercises. Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2401796.2401799
Språkrådet. (2007). Spørsmål og svar. Språkrådet, 35(2), 32–33.
Stenseth, B., Kaufmann, O. T., & Forsström, S. E. (2019). Programmering og matematikk. Tangenten, 30(2), 7–12.
Stephens, M. (2019). EMBEDDING ALGORITHMIC THINKING MORE CLEARLY IN THE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM. 9.
Stolpe, K., & Larsson, A. (2023). ”Vi går in och tittar i mappen” -En lärares språkliga strukturering av rumslighet i programmeringsundervisning: “Let’s go look inside the folder” – A teacher’s way of structuring spatiality when teaching programming. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 19(2), Artikkel 2.
Strawhacker, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019). What they learn when they learn coding: Investigating cognitive domains and computer programming knowledge in young children. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 541–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9622-x
Streibel, M. J. (1983). The Educational Utility of LOGO. School Science and Mathematics, 83(6), 474–484.
Sutherland, R. (1989). Providing a Computer Based Framework for Algebraic Thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(3), 317–344. JSTOR.
Swanier, C. A., Seals, C. D., & Billionniere, E. V. (2009). Visual Programming: A Programming Tool for Increasing Mathematics Achivement. Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 1–5.
Sweigart, A. (2015). Automate the Boring Stuff with Python: Practical Programming for Total Beginners (1 edition). No Starch Press.
Taraldsen & Myhra. (2019). Programmering med spheroballer. Tangenten, 4. http://www.caspar.no/tangenten/2019/Tangenten%204%202019%20Taraldsen%20Myhra.pdf
Tedre, M., & Denning, P. J. (2016). The long quest for computational thinking. Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research - Koli Calling ’16, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/2999541.2999542
Tellefsen, C. W., Brandt, H., & Hushovd, O. T. (2018). Moskuspopulasjonen på Dovrefjell. Aschehoug. https://tjenester.lokus.no/open/programmering/nedlasting/moskuspopulasjonen.pdf
The LEAD Project. (2013). Super Scratch Programming Adventure! (2nd edition). No Starch Press.
Tran, Y. (2018). Computer Programming Effects in Elementary: Perceptions and Career Aspirations in STEM. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(2), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9358-z
UC Computer science education, Google, & Microsoft. (2019). CS Unplugged. CS Unplugged. https://csunplugged.org/en/
Universitetsforlaget. (2019). Vi kan lykkes i realfag—Universitetsforlaget. https://www.universitetsforlaget.no/nettbutikk/vi-kan-lykkes-i-realfag-uf.html
Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2019, mars 27). Algoritmisk tenkning. https://www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/profesjonsfaglig-digital-kompetanse/algoritmisk-tenkning/
Valentine, K. D. (2018). Tinkering with Logo in an Elementary Mathematics Methods Course. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1754
Vee, A. (2013). Understanding Computer Programming as a Literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies, 1(2), Artikkel 2. https://doi.org/10.21623/1.1.2.4
Verstad, A. L. T. (2017). Programmering + Matematikk = Sant? En casestudie om overføringsverdien mellom programmering valgfag og matematikkfaget. https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/11601
Vihavainen, A., Paksula, M., & Luukkainen, M. (2011). Extreme apprenticeship method in teaching programming for beginners. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953196
Vinnervik, P. (2020). Implementing programming in school mathematics and technology: Teachers’ intrinsic and extrinsic challenges. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09602-0
Vinnervik, P., & Bungum, B. (2021). PROGRAMMING IN THE CURRICULUM FOR COMPULSORY SCHOOL: HOW IS IT REPRESENTED IN NORDIC COUNTRIES? 4.
Vorderman, C. (2017). Spill- og dataprogrammering for barn (B. Magnussen, Oms.). Spektrum forlag.
Wanderås, U. H. (2020). OK, vi bare sjekker hvordan det ble—En kvalitativ studie om bruk av programmering som verktøy i arbeid med geometri [Masteroppgave]. NTNU.
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. (14. utg.). Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/9780521430173
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education.
Yelland, N. (1997). Creating Mathematical Contexts with Logo. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(3), 222–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00028
Yildiz Durak, H. (2018). Flipped learning readiness in teaching programming in middle schools: Modelling its relation to various variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 939–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12302
Zingaro, D., & Porter, L. (2014). Peer Instruction in computing: The value of instructor intervention. Comput. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.015
Øystese, Å. (2016). En lærers undervisningsmetoder i geometri på 8. Trinn når GeoGebra brukes. Universitetet i Agder.

Sutherland, R. (1994). The role of programming: Towards experimental mathematics. I R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträßer, & B. Winkelmann (Red.), Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://www.academia.edu/3114007/The_role_of_programming_towards_experimental_mathematics

Studie av bruk av 3D LOGO, niande trinn (Hellas): https://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5118/pdf/CERME10_0386.pdf