CenSES Annual Report 2015

CenSES annual report 2015

Appendix 3: Publications

Journal papers

1. Alnæs, Erik Nicholas; Grøndahl, Roger Blikra; Fleten, Stein-Erik;

Boomsma, Trine Krogh (2015). Insights from Actual Day-Ahead Bid-

ding of Hydropower. International Journal of Sustainable Energy

Planning and Management 7: 37-58

2. Alnæs, Erik Nicholas; Grøndahl, Roger Blikra; Fleten, Stein-Erik;

Boomsma, Trine Krogh (2015). Insights from Actual Day-Ahead Bid-

ding of Hydropower. International Journal of Sustainable Energy

Planning and Management7: 37-58

3. Arvesen, Anders; Hauan, Ingrid Bjerke; Bolsøy, Bernhard Mikal;

Hertwich, Edgar G. (2015). Life cycle assessment of transport of elec-

tricity via different voltage levels: A case study for Nord-Trøndelag

county in Norway. Applied Energy 157: 144-151

4. Arvesen, Anders; Hertwich, Edgar G. (2015). More caution is need-

ed when using life cycle assessment to determine energy return on

investment (EROI). Energy Policy 76: 1-6

5. Bjørgum, Øyvind; Netland, Torbjørn H. (2015). Configuration of

supply chains in emerging industries: A multiple-case study in the

wave-and-tidal energy industry. International Journal of Manufac-

turing Technology and Management (IJMTM) 00: 00-00

6. Bjørgum, Øyvind; Sørheim, Roger (2015). The funding of new

technology firms in a pre-commercial industry – the role of smart

capital. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 27(3): 249-266

7. Bjørgum, Øyvind; Sørheim, Roger.The funding of new technology

firms in a pre-commercial industry – the role of smart capital. Tech-

nology Analysis & Strategic Management 27(3): 249-266

8. Ellingsen, Linda Ager-Wick; Majeau-Bettez, Guillaume; Strømman,

Anders Hammer (2015). Comment on “The significance of Li-ion

batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and

recycling’s role in its reduction” in Energy & Environmental Science.

Journal of Industrial Ecology 19(3):.518-519

9. Fleten, S.E., Hagen, L.A., Nygaard, M.T., Smith-Sivertsen, R., Sollie,

J.M. The overnight risk premium in electricity forward contracts.

Energy Economics 49, 293-300.

10. Fodstad, Marte, Midthun, Kjetil T. & Tomasgard, Asgeir (2015).

Adding flexibility in a natural gas transportation network using in-

terruptible transportation services. European Journal of Operational

Research243(2): 647-657

11. Gibon, Thomas; Wood, Richard; Arvesen, Anders; Bergesen, Jo-

seph; Suh, Sangwon; Hertwich, Edgar G. (2015). A Methodology for

Integrated, Multiregional Life Cycle Assessment Scenarios under

Large-Scale Technological Change. Environmental Sciencand Tech-

nology 49(18): 11218-11226

12. Godbolt, Åsne Lund (2015). The ethos of energy efficiency: Fram-

ing consumer considerations in Norway. Energy Research & Social

Science 8: 24-31

13. Hansen, Gard Hopsdal; Steen, Markus (2015). Offshore oil and

gas firms’ involvement in offshore wind: Technological frames and

undercurrents. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions

17: 1-14

14. Heidenreich, Sara (2015). Sublime technology and object of fear:

offshore wind scientists assessing publics. Environment and plan-

ning A 47(5): 1047-1062

15. Hellemo, Lars; Tomasgard, Asgeir. (2015) A generalized global

optimization formulation of the pooling problem with processing

facilities and composite quality constraints. TOP - An Official Journal

of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research.

16. Karbø, K., Breivik, R., Aall, C. Sumverknader av tekniske inngrep

i naturmiljøet: erfaringar, utfordringar og innspel til vegen vidare

med fokus på forvalting av ny fornybar energy. Utmark – tidsskrift

for utmarksforskning. (accepted for publication)

17. Mauritzen, Johannes. How electricity price spikes can help over-

come the energy efficiency gap. Economics Letters 134: 114-117

18. Ottesen, Stig Ø. & Tomasgard, Asgeir (2015). A stochastic model

for scheduling energy flexibility in buildings, Energy 88: 364-376

19. Paraschiv, Florentina; Fleten, Stein-Erik; Schürle, Michael (2015). A

spot-forward model for electricity prices with regime shifts. Energy

Economics 47: 142-153

20. Paraschiv, Florentina; Fleten, Stein-Erik; Schürle, Michael. A

spot-forward model for electricity prices with regime shifts. Energy

Economics 47:142-153

21. Pauliuk, Stefan; Hertwich, Edgar G. (2015). Socioeconomic me-

tabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human

societies. Ecological Economics 119: 83-93

22. Salom, Jaume; Widén, Joakim; Candanedo, José; Lindberg, Karen

Byskov (2015). Analysis of grid interaction indicators in net zero-en-

ergy buildings with sub-hourly collected data. Advances in Building

Energy Research 9(1): 89-106

23. Salom, Jaume; Widén, Joakim; Candanedo, José; Lindberg, Karen

Byskov (2015). Analysis of grid interaction indicators in net zero-en-

ergy buildings with sub-hourly collected data. Advances in Building

Energy Research 9(1): 89-106

24. Seljom, P., Tomasgard, A. 2015. Short-term uncertainty in long-

term energy system models - A case study of wind power in Den-

mark, Energy Economics 49: 157-167

25. Singh, Bhawna; Ellingsen, Linda Ager-Wick; Strømman, Anders

Hammer (2015). Pathways for GHG emission reduction in Norwegian

road transport sector: Perspective on consumption of passenger car

transport and electricity mix. Transportation Research Part D: Trans-

port and Environment 41: 160-164

26. Skjølsvold, Tomas Moe; Lindkvist, Carmel Margaret (2015). Am-

bivalence, designing users, and user imaginaries in the European

smart grid: Insights from an interdisciplinary demonstration project.

Energy Research & Social Science 9: 43-50.

27. Skjølsvold, Tomas Moe; Ryghaug, Marianne (2015). Embedding

smart energy technology in built environments: A comparative

study of four smart grid demonstration projects. Indoor + Built Envi-

ronment 24(7):.878-890

28. Skjølsvold, Tomas Moe; Ryghaug, Marianne. Embedding smart

energy technology in built environments: A comparative study of

four smart grid demonstration projects. Indoor + Built Environment

2015 NTNU

29. Steinmo, Marianne (2015). Collaboration for Innovation: A Case

Study on How Social Capital Mitigates Collaborative Challenges

in University-Industry Research Alliances. Industry and Innovation

22(7): 597-624