To define the effectiveness of the CNC and discover possible faults, we test ARTS 2.0 on turkey slices.
Since Lightburn is not made for milling with spindle, the G-code has to be post-processed through a python code as per now.
def post_process_gcode(input_file, output_file): add_custom_command = True add_M5_before_M9 = True # Open the input file in read mode with open(input_file, 'r') as f: lines = f.readlines() # Open the output file in write mode with open(output_file, 'w') as f: for line in lines: # Check if the line is a rapid move command (G0) with Z10 if add_M5_before_M9 == False: f.write(line) elif line.startswith('G0') and 'Z10' in line: # Change rapid move command to linear move (G1) with Z10 modified_line = line.replace('G0', 'G1') if(add_custom_command==True): for newline in lines: if newline.startswith('G1'): spindle_speed = "S" + newline.split('S', 1)[-1].strip() # Extracting all characters after "S" including "S" print(spindle_speed) break #modified_line+=spindle_speed modified_line = "M3" + "\n" + modified_line.strip() + spindle_speed + "\n" print(modified_line) f.write(modified_line) add_custom_command = False elif line.startswith('G1') and 'S' in line: no_spindle_g1 = newline.split('S', 1)[0].strip() + "\n" # Extracting all characters after "S" including "S" f.write(no_spindle_g1) # Check if the line is a spindle stop command (M5) or spindle start command (M3) elif line.startswith('M5') or line.startswith('M3'): # Ignore these commands until M9 pass # Check if the line is the spindle stop command (M9) elif line.startswith('M9'): # Add M5 before M9 if add_M5_before_M9: f.write('M5\n') add_M5_before_M9 = False # Write the line as it is f.write(line) else: # Write the line as it is f.write(line) # Example usage if __name__ == "__main__": input_file = 'Cutting_samples_2S_100p.gc' output_file = 'PP_Cutting_samples_2S_100p.gc' post_process_gcode(input_file, output_file) print("G-code post-processing complete!") |
Slice | Settings | Status | Comments | Future change |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Speed: 10mm/s Power: 100% | Failure | Too fast. | Slow down. |
2 | Speed: 2mm/s Power: 100% | Failure | Did not cut all the way through. | Lower the spindle. |
3 | Speed: 1mm/s Power: 100% | Success | Mill bit diameter too high | Change mill bit / Raise spindle. |
4 | Speed: 1mm/s Power: 100% | Failure | Freezer too warm, slice thawed and loosened | Let the freezer be cold enough before cutting. |
5 | Speed: 1mm/s Power: 100% | Success | A lot of spooning | Make a suction. |
6 | Speed: 1mm/s Power: 100% | Failure | Clamping was not able to keep slice suspended against downward force. | Make a baseplate with bigger hole. |
7 | Speed: 1mm/s Power: 100% | - | - | - |
8 | Speed: 1mm/s Power: 100% Layer height: 0.50 | Success | The last sample did not fall down | |
9 | Speed: 1mm/s Power: 100% Layer height: 0.50 | Success | The last sample did not fall down | Increase layer height for bigger last cut |
10 | Speed: 0.6mm/s Power: 100% Layer height: 0.75 | Success | The first sample did not fall down. Had to change mill bit to Ø1.0mm | |
CNC cut too fast. Mill pushed the slice around slightly.
Samples had a difficulty coming loose.
Mill pushed the slice around slightly.
This time the mill cut well through the samples, but the mill bit diameter was quite large, and so quite a bit of material was lost.
The mill also left a bunch of spooning, which argues for a suction.
The samples did not slice quite as preferred after having being cut loose from the slice, one small sample even jumped away.
Cutting went well. We tried letting the CNC take multiple passes to improve the cut quality. I suspect the first layer is cut too deep.
Also added priority for the cross in the grid samples. Might be better to treat them as separate samples and sample them one by one instead of cross plus square.
(No image)
Cutting went well. We tried letting the CNC take multiple passes to improve the cut quality. The mill was raised slightly since last cut, this resulted in a nice quality cut, but also a lot of spooning.
We tried cutting out samples without a bed, to let the samples fall down when done, this did not work as hoped. The clamping was not strong enough to resist the downward force. It was however able to resist the shear force.
(No Image)
We modified the cutting procedure to cut the matrix as four separate squares, instead of as a cross and a square. This will take longer to cut, but will provide one sample at a time.
Image
First test slice with new setup.
Temperature data found in: arduino_data_log - Copy 130420241814
Image
Temperature data found in: arduino_data_log - Copy 140420241921
Temperature data found in: arduino_data_log - Copy 150420241409
Image