This project topic is proposed with Professor Mary Ann Lundteigen as main supervisor for fall 2015. I will use this wiki page in relation to the project execution, meaning that more details related to tasks to be carried out may be published here.

 

Important information: I will hold an information meeting about the project Wednesday 13th of May at 12-13. Please notify me in advance if you are coming. If more than 8 students, I will need to find a new room to make a seat for all.

 

About the project

This project assignment is based on the theory and methods you learnt in TPK 4120 Safety and Reliability Analysis and what you will learn in TPK5170 – RAMS assessment and optimization in the coming autumn. The intention is that several students may choose this assignment, supervision will be given jointly half of the semester then individually, and each student must submit individual project reports.

The main focus of the project is on systems reliability assessment. Such assessments are carried out to demonstrate that a technological system is sufficiently reliable and safe, but the results are subject to many sources of uncertainty:

  • Technology is becoming more complex, with more interdependencies between functions and between physical components. One single event may have effects that are difficult to foresee and therefore to model.
  • Data is sparse for new technology elements
  • Many different reliability assessment methods are available, but which one to choose?

The objective of this project is to give the students a deeper insight into what are framing reliability assessments, how the assessments may be carried out, and the application of the results in decision-making, considering the uncertainty level.

The main application is on safety-critical systems, where reliability assessments are framed under standards like IEC 61508 standard (different sectors may have different versions of the standard). More specifically, the student may focus on one of the following study cases, with basis in strategic research activities in the RAMS group:

Safety and reliability assessment of safety-critical subsea systems

Subsea systems are subject to a number of challenging requirements and constraints from being placed under water, far away, and possibly in very sensitive environments. The main objective of this specialization project is to investigate the reliability challenges in more detail of selected subsea systems (e.g., blow out preventer (BOP), high integrity pressure protection system (HIPPS), XT), and to identify suitable methods for use in risk assessments and reliability assessments. New design philosophies, like e.g., all electric or integration of control and safety functions may be investigated using available literature including patents.

The Reliability of subsea systems is of strategic interest to the RAMS group, as we are involved in the recently established Centre for Subsea Production and Processing SUBPRO (www.ntnu.edu/subpro). The centre has an extensive industry involvement, and with a project in this area, we expect good opportunities for continuing with a master project in collaboration with a company.

Management of RAMS in design of critical infrastructures, with focus on new strait crossing bridges

The new ferry free E-39 being planned along the coast from Trondheim to Kristiansand will face a number of challenges related to demanding crossing conditions (water depth, length, other traffic at sea, sea current, rough weather, and so on). The RAMS group has established a collaboration with the Road Administration (Statens Vegvesen) for developing a RAMS framework for use in the Ferry-free E-39 project. The framework shall identify how key RAMS requirements are to be established and managed in all life cycle phases. The purpose of this specialization project is to study methods, requirements, and frameworks of relevance to write a master project that will contribute to the completion of this RAMS framework.  One starting point for the specialization project is therefore to study literature on the treatment of RAMS requirements in more mature application areas, such as for tunnel construction and railway (EN 50126 standard). Another path is to study technology qualification frameworks to see how they can aligned in the evaluation of new bridge /tunnel concepts. One of the strait crossings defined as pilot projects may be studied in more detail. There are very good opportunities to continue the work into a master project with supervision from the Road Administration, or with a consultancy company that carry out studies in this area. It may be remarked that some of the literature of relevance to this topic will be in Norwegian.

The supervision will be joint in the start of the semester, and individual as needed later in the semester. Each student must submit individual project reports on the topics agreed.

Project tasks

Sub projectPreliminary tasksUseful literature
Reliability and safety
assessments
of subsea systems
  • Make a description of the subsea system agreed upon
    • Functional description
    • Failure modes and failure classification
    (A possible case study is blowout preventer (BOP) due to the extensive amount of information available, or alternatively,
    the autonomous high integrity pressure protection system (HIPPS) that is often installed in relation to subsea tie-ins)
  • Identify and discuss applicable reliability and safety challenges in relation to the operation of such systems
  • Identify and describe relevant regulations and standards that apply for design and operation of this system
  • Identify and discuss relevant measures in relation to safety and reliability assessments of the system
  • Identify and compare methods used to assess reliability in literature for the system being considered
    and/or of systems that share key properties of this system, and discuss the pros and cons
    of the different approaches
    • (A selection on methods may be selected)
  • Identify and discuss key parameters for reliability assessment, and the availability to data that may
    support such assessments
  • Identify ideas for further work

The project tasks are carried out with basis in a thorough literature review that is documented in the report.

Relevant literature will depend on the application, and may include:

  • Regulatory webpages and regulations (giving overall requirements, and references to applicable standards)
  • Standards and industry guidelines, that give more detailed requirements on methods and practices
  • Patents as a useful source of having detailed description of system elements
  • Scientific articles, that include proposals for new methods or the results of case studies
  • Books, such as https://www.ntnu.edu/ross/books/sis.

 

Management of RAMS in design
of critical (road) infrastructures

  • Give a description of the E-39 Ferry Free project and identify and discuss some of the challenges faced that
    may be attributed to reliability, availability, maintainability/maintenance, and safety.
  • Give a description of the typical lifecycle phases of a critical road infrastructure, with support of relevant
    handbooks published by the Road Administration ("Statens vegvesen")
  • Define what we mean by RAMS management, and the typical activities involved.
  • Extend on elements of RAMS management, by studying:
    • The RAMS management approach used in railway industry, with basis in in EN 50126 and
      scientific publications, reports and industry guidelines.
    • Technology qualification approach used in the oil and gas industry, with basis in DNV-GL
      recommended practice and API standards, supported by scientific literature, reports and
      industry guidelines on the area.
    • Lifecon project, an EU project carried out with focus on lifecycle management of concrete structures
  • Compare differences and similarities in the RAMS management approaches that have been studied
  • Point at some of the areas where improvements are needed.

     

Relevant literature include:

  • EN 50126 (international standard for railway, accessible from NTNU library)
  • Various reports on E-39 ferry free project (many of these are in Norwegian)
  • Various handbooks published by the Road Administration (often in Norwegian)
  • Previous EU project called Lifecon (link to be provided)
  • Scientific articles on RAMS management
  • Reports and guidelines on tunnel safety
Joint for both projects

I would like - towards the end of the semester (e.g., 3 weeks before handing in the project) - that you give a presentation of your work in a mini seminar arranged for this purpose. The main benefits of this approach are:

  • It is often helpful in the final stage of the work to extract the main findings and results, and share them with others for feedback
  • It represents a milestone, and milestones are good to have at least towards the end
  • You are able to also see what the others have been doing, and perhaps you get some ideas to bring into your own work
 
  • No labels