This page currently includes all the references from STAN84, but will be expanded as papers and other outputs of the project are added to the site. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: the impact of a philosophy of science course on pre-service science teachers' views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 15-42. Ahtee, M., Lavonen, J. & Pehkonen, E. (2008). Reasons Behind the Finnish Sucess in Science and Mathematics Education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century: Recent Issues in Education, 6, 18-26. Bamford, A. (2006). The Wow-factor. Global research compendium on the impact of arts in education. A UNESCO report. Munchen: Waxman. Bandura, A.(1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman and Company. Barnes, D. (1992): The Significance of Teachers' Frames for Teaching. In: Russell, T. & Munby, H. (eds): Teachers and Teaching: From Classrooms to Reflection. London: The Falmer Press. Brinkman, F., & De Jong, O. (1996). Science and mathematics teacher education: some themes of general interest. European Journal of Teacher Education, 19(2), 103-115. Bungum, B. (2006). Transferring and transforming technology education: A case study of Norwegian teachers' perceptions of ideas from design & technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 31-52. Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 474-482. Carrasquillo, A. & Rodriguez, V. (2002). Language Minority Students in the Mainstream Classroom (2nd ed.). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Coelho, E. (1998). Teaching and Learning in Multicultural Schools. An Integrated Approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Collins, R. (2000). Among the better ones: Upward assimilation in social comparison. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison (159 - 172).New York: Kluwer / Plenum Press. Costa, J., Caldeira, M. H., Gallastegui, J. R. & Otero, J. (2000). An analysis of question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 602-614. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, Power and Pedagogy. Bilingual Children in the Crossfire.Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Daniel, M.F; Lafortune I; Pallascio R; Schleifer M; Mongeau, P (1999): "Philosophical dialogue among pupils: a potent tool for learning mathematics" in Palsson, H;,. Sigurdardottir B,;Nelson Y. B.: Philosophy for children on top of the world. Akureyri Akureyri Univ. DCSF (Department of Children, Schools and Families) (2007a) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Interventions with Parents Research Report RW008, London, DCSF. DCSF (Department of Children, Schools and Families) (2007b) Engaging Parents in raising Achievement: Do Parents Know They Matter? Research Report RW004, London, DCSF. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of Self-Determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press. Dompnier, B., Pansu, P., & Bressoux, P. (2007). Social utility, social desirability and scholastic judgments: toward a personological model of academic evaluation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(3), 333-350. Donnelly, J. (1995). Curriculum developments in science: the lessons of Sc1. School Science Review, 76(227), 95-103. Duggan, S. & Gott, R. (1995). The place of investigations in practical work in UK National Curriculum for Science. International Journal of Science Education, 17 (2), 137-147. Duggan, S., Johnson, P., & Gott, R. (1996). A critical point in defining investigative work: Defining variables. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 461-474. EC (European Commission) (2007) Science Education Now: A renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe: Report of the High-Level Group on Science Education Brussels, EC Directorate -General for Research: available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf EC (European Commission) (2004a) Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe: Report to be presented at the EC Conference "Europe needs More Scientists" Brussels, European Commission. EC (European Commission) (2004b). Europe needs more scientists. Report by the High Level Group on Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe. Brussels, European Commission, Elliot, A. J., Dweck, C.S. (2005). Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford Press. Enghag, M., & Niedderer, H. (2007) Two Dimensions of Student Ownership of Learning During Small-Group Work in Physics, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6:629-653 Erduran, S & Jimenez-Aleixandre M. P. (Eds.) 2008, Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer. EURYDICE (2006) Science Teaching in Schools in Europe: Policies and Research Brussels, European Commission.available at: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/Eurydice/showPresentation?pubid=081EN Evans, R.H. (March, 1999). Methodological competence: using science processes to interpret and hypothesize about natural artifacts. An article and video-presentation published as a CD-ROM. IPN Scientific Literacy Series, Kiel, Germany. Evans, R. H. (1997). A challenge to the science education community: Morris H. Shamos' The Myth of Scientific Literacy . In Graber, W. & Bolte, C. (Eds.), Scientific Literacy (pp. 103-120). Kiel, Germany: IPN. Evans, R. and Koballa, T. (2002): Umsetzung der Theorie in die Praxis (Transformation of Theory into School Practice) in Graber, W., Nentwig, P., Koballa, T. & Evans, R. (Hrsg.): Scientific Literacy. Der Beitrag der Naturwissenschaften zur Allgemeinen Bildung. (Scientific Literacy: The Value of Science in General Education) Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Fan, Y., Hoel, T.L., Tjeldvoll, A., Engvik, G. (Eds.). (2006) Assuring University Learning Quality: Cross-Boundary Collaboration. Trondheim, Tapir Academic Press Farkac J., & Bozkova H. (2006). Biological Olympiad. Prague: Jan Farkac Publishing. (in Czech). Goodson, I. F. (1992). Sponsoring the teacher's voice: Teachers' lives and teacher development. In A. Hargreaves & M. G. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development. London: Cassell. Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (2002). Problems with the assessment of performance in practical science: Which way now? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 83-201. Gowin, D. B. & Alvarez, M. C. (2005). The art of educating with V Diagrams. New York: Cambridge University Press. Graber, W., Nentwig, P., Koballa, T. & Evans, R. (Hrsg.) (2002): Scientific Literacy. Der Beitrag der Naturwissenschaften zur Allgemeinen Bildung. (Scientific Literacy: The Value of Science in General Education) Opladen: Leske + Budrich Goucha, Moufida (2007) Philosophy: a school of freedom; Teaching philosophy and learning to philosophize: status and prospects, Paris, UNESCO. Grangeat, M. & Gray, P. (2008). Teaching as a collective work: analysis, current research and implications for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34 (3), 2008, 177-189). Grangeat, M. & Gray, P. (2007). Factors influencing teachers' professional competence development. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59 (4), 485-501. Gueudet, G. (2008) Digital resources and mathematics teachers' documents, JEM Network (Joining Educational Mathematics), 5th Workshop, Paris. Gueudet, G., Trouche, L. (2008) Collective documentation work as a mode of teacher training : which methodological assistants ? Colloque ECER, Goteborg, Suede. Hajer, M. (2000). Creating a language promoting classroom: content-area teachers at work.In J. K. Hall & L. S.Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 265-286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1990). Tertiary laboratory classroom. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.). The student laboratory and the science curriculum. London: Routledge. Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1-41. Hipkins, R., Barker, M., & Bolstad, R. (2005). Teaching the "nature of science": modest adaptations or radical reconceptions? International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 243-254. Hodson, D. (1992). Assessment of practical work: Some considerations in philosophy of science. Science and Education, 1, 115-144. Hodson, D., & Bencze, J. (1998). Becoming critical about practical work: changing views and changing practice through action research. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 683-694. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Designing Argumentation learning environments. In Erduran, S. & Jimenez Aleixandre, M.P (Eds) Argumentation in Science Education. Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp 91-115). Dordrecht: Springer Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.; Rodriguez, A. & Duschl, R. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics. Science Education, 84, 757-792. Klette K., Odegaard M., Arnesen N.E. (2007): Time Scales and Coding Categories in Video Analyses. Invited symposium contribution at ESERA, August 21-25. 2007 Klette K., (2007): Trends in Research on teaching and Learning in Schools: Didactics meets Classroom studies. In European Educational Research Journal, Vol.6, No 2 (pp147-161). Krogh, L., Thomsen, P.V. (2005). Studying students' attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: border crossing into the physics classroom, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 27 no. 3, pp. 281-302. KUF (1999) St. meld. nr. 39 (1998-99). Forskning ved et tidsskille. Kirke-, utdannings- og forskningsdepartementet, Oslo |