...
With the prevailing profile of the course, there are two main subject areas of this course: 
Reliability assessment methods with focus on the application with safety-critical systems, and Maintenance optimization models and methods which have a broader application area.
Subject area: Reliability assessment of safety-critical systems | Lecture material: | ||
Lectured topic | Motivation | Topics by key words | |
|---|---|---|---|
Development of reliability requirements
| "Safety integrity level (SIL) is a key reliability performance measure used for safety-critical systems. Reliability requirements are therefore often given as SIL requirements are identified in an extension of the risk analysis, using methods often refered to as SIL allocation, SIL targeting and SIL classification. Key methods like Layers of protection analysis (LOPA), risk graph, and minimum SIL are presented and discussed." | SIL allocation LOPA Risk graph Minimum SIL | |
| New New reliability assessment methods | In In TPK 4120, some analytical formulas were introduced to calculate the average probability of failure on demand (PFD). It was also shown how the average PFD may be calculated using Markov methods and fault tree analysis. This reliability measure is of high importance in relation to SIL, as a relationship is established between a SIL requirement and the maximum PFD tolerated for a safety function. In this course, we go a step further and introduce the foundations for analytical formulas presented in IEC 61508 (a key standard for reliability of safety-critical systems), the PDS method (a method along with a set of analytical formulas widely adapted in the Norwegian oil and gas industry, but which has a wider application area), and dynamic modeling, using Petri Nets." | ||
Special analysis challenges (possible candidates for under this heading):
| |||
PDS method PetriNet | |||
| Special topics (one or two are selected among these) | Architectural constraints: According to standards like IEC 61508, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that a SIL requirement has been met by showing that the average PFD or PFH is sufficiently low and within the specified range of the SIL requirement. A SIL requirement also poses some restrictions on how a safety-critical function can be designed, in terms of architecture. These requirements are sometimes referred to as architectural constraints. Partial testing: For some type of components, like valves, it has been more common to also do partial stroke testing in addition to full functional testing. The reason for introdocing this testing strategy may be to improve safety, or to maintain safety while extending the intervall of full function testing. Analytical models have been suggested for this purpose, and we will review these. Imperfect testing: Many of the methods used to calculate the average PFD assumes that the functional tests are perfect, meaning that all dangerous undetected (DU) falures are revealed by the test. This is not always the case, and the effect of not taking this "imperfectness" into account will be that the average PFD is underestimated. The way this situation is treated overlaps to some extent with how partial testing is modeled. SIL follow-up in operation: It is important to maintain the reliability performance throughout the whole operational life of a safety-critical system. This may explained by using a car as an example. You may buy a car with a certain designed-in performance, including reliability, based on the engine type, safety features, type of chassis, and so on. Still, the experienced performance of the same type of car may be different for different drivers. If we exclude fabrication errors, the performance of the car is influenced by the driver's driving habits, amount of driving, environment (icy, cold, hot,..), age and so on.
| Architectural constraints
Partial stroke testing
Imperfect testing
SIL follow-up | |
Maintenance optimization and management | Lecture | ||
Subject area: Maintenance optimization | |||
| material: | |||
| Lectured topics | within this area are:Motivation | Topics by key words | |
| Age, block and minimal repair strategies. | The intervals of maintenance for safety-critical systems are normally determined from the reliability analyses. For other systems, we may use decide upon intervals of testing using different maintenance strategies. These models include parameters like costs, failure rates, and aging. The models come of with the answer to the following two questions: When should we do maintenance and what tasks and equipment should be included. The application of these methods are many. Two examples are maintenance planning of railway tracks and another is planning of intervention (for maintenance purposes) of subsea equipment. Sub-topics also covered under the same "umbrella" are:
| ||
| Spare part optimization: | Spare parts may be costly to have on the stock, but at the same time it is costly not to have a spare part available when it is needed. This topic concern how to calculate the probability of running out of spares, using simple formulas and Markov analyses. The use of Monte-carlo simulations for this purpose is also shown. This topic may not be some relevant for very specialized systems, where it is not possible to aquire a spare within short time. For a manufacturer that develops products, such as sensors, in a large scale to e.g. the oil and gas industry, it may be relevant to find the optimal number of spare parts for warranty and repair services. | ||
| Prognostics Prognostics and remaining useful life: **Say something here** | |||
| Bayesian methods | |||
| Counting Counting processes |
Tutorials & Project
There will be mandatory problems/tasks to solve as part of the course.
...