Den største utfordring til forebyggende helsearbeid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v5i2.254Sammendrag
S
AMMENDRAGAntall årlige dødsofre av tobakksrøyking anslås nå til 3
millioner (alle land samlet); i 2025 vil det være 10 millioner,
hvis ikke røykemønstret endres. Storstilt global forebyggende
innsats har latt vente på seg, vesentlig p.g.a. tobakksindustriens
motstand og myndighetenes lunkenhet.
Det er påvist virkning av en rekke tiltak, bl.a. reklameforbud,
helseadvarsler på pakkene, avgiftsøkninger og røykerestriksjoner.
For å skape et effektivt program er det nødvendig med
solid faglig ekspertise, sterke pressgrupper, engasjerte byråkrater
og handlekraftige politikere.
Canada har for tiden det mest avanserte program. Norge lå
bra an i 1970-årene, men sakket noe av i 80-årene. Tobakksforbruket
steg inntil ca. 1975, men er falt senere. Det samme
gjelder prosent dagligrøykere blant elever i grunnskolen. Det har
vært en nedgang i dagligrøyking blant menn; blant kvinner er det
hittil liten endring, unntatt blant de yngste, som har nedgang.
Utviklingen i de fattige landene er mest bekymringsfull.
Norske politikere burde være pådrivere for å få FN til å vedta en
internasjonal konvensjon om tobakkskontroll.
Administrerende overlege, dr.med. Kjell Bjartveit,
Statens helseundersøkelser
Bjartveit K.
The greatest challenge to preventive health work. Nor J Epidemiol 1995; 5 (2): 93-106.
ENGLISH SUMMARY
It is estimated that, worldwide, three million people die every year as a result of tobacco smoking. This
number will increase to 10 million by year 2025 if today's pattern of smoking continues. Large-scale global
preventive action is long in coming, mainly due to resistance of the tobacco industry and a lukewarm attitude on
the part of national governments.
Various measures, such as a ban on advertising, health warnings on packaging, tax increases and restrictions
on smoking, have been shown to work. Prerequisites for an effective programme are highly qualified
professional expertise, strong pressure groups, dedicated bureaucrats and energetically involved politicians.
Canada has the most advanced programme at present. Norway's efforts compared favourably in the 1970s,
but slowed down in the 1980s. Per capita tobacco consumption increased up to about 1975, but has since
declined. The same applies to the percentage of smokers in the lower secondary schools. The prevalence of daily
smoking has declined among men; little change has been observed in women, except in the youngest age group,
where smoking has decreased.
Developments in the poor countries of the world give greatest cause for concern. Norwegian politicians
should actively urge the United Nations to adopt an international convention on tobacco control.
Downloads
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Norsk Epidemiologi licenses all content of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) licence. This means, among other things, that anyone is free to copy and distribute the content, as long as they give proper credit to the author(s) and the journal. For further information, see Creative Commons website for human readable or lawyer readable versions.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).