Women’s health and gender perspectives in the history of modern Norwegian epidemiology

Authors

  • Berit Schei
  • Berit Rostad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v25i1-2.1891

Abstract

In this chapter, we will discuss selected aspects of the impact of women’s movement on the development
of modern epidemiology in Norway based on the experiences of leading a research program in Women’s
Health (RPWH, 1991-96) aimed at mapping and assessing gender based public health research in Norway,
and the establishment in 1997 of a research group in Women’s Health at the Department of Public Health
and General Practice, NTNU. During the 1990s, several steps were taken both internationally as well as
nationally to ensure that diseases which were affecting men and women unequally were given adequate
attention. Examples of such diseases include osteoporosis and hip fractures. Studies of diseases seen as a
typically men’s, such as coronary heart disease, were often conducted exclusively on men. The inclusion
and separate analysis based on gender, and the establishment of special cohorts of women, yielded a more
complex understanding. Further the gender perspective revealed gendered patterns of risks. Traditionally
risks such as cigarette smoking were shown to have a differential effect dependent on gender. Perinatal
epidemiology, traditionally used to assess outcomes related to the new-born, were expanded to also assess
impact of pregnancy on women themselves during and after childbirth. Disorders such as pelvic pain,
urinary and anal incontinence as well as fear of pregnancy and depression during and after childbirth came
to the attention of researchers. New risks were uncovered as women started to disclose the experience of
violence and abuse both as adult and when growing up.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-31

How to Cite

Schei, B., & Rostad, B. (2015). Women’s health and gender perspectives in the history of modern Norwegian epidemiology. Norsk Epidemiologi, 25(1-2). https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v25i1-2.1891