Craftsmanship in the machine: sustainability through new roles in building craft at the technologized building site
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v5i2.2321Keywords:
Craftspeople, Building sites, Work automation, Workmanship uncertainty, Crafting sustainability, Community of practice, Planning, Lean construction, Workmanship of riskAbstract
The building industry is becoming increasingly characterized by automated production, and in line with this, the nature of craftsmanship is transforming. In this article, we look for a sustainable path for this transformation through a case study that follows a team of carpenters building a set of tower blocks at a high-tech building site using “lean” construction techniques and robotic production technology. The builders are organized according to complex schedules of lean construction, making work at the building site resemble that of a large machine. The builders hold multiple roles within this machine: more than simply “living mechanisms” inside the machine, they also take on more parental roles as “machinists,” employing their crafting skills in planning, problem solving, improvising, coordinating and fettling in order to make the building machine run smoothly and to minimize environmental uncertainty. The craftsmanship in action is characterized by what we call workmanship of uncertainty – the ability to produce certain results in uncertain conditions. We identify this as the collective skill of a community of practice. The sustainability of craftsmanship in the machine is analyzed according to three kinds of sustainability: cultural, social and ecological. We suggest that all three forms depend on the building company’s ability to provide working conditions that allow the builders to form stable communities of practice in order to perform, share and develop craftmanship. Finally, we show that working in and with technological production systems does not require fewer skills (of craftsmanship) than traditional building, but a nuanced application of these skills.
Downloads
References
A. A. Balkema.
Alber, J. and Standing, G. 2000. Social dumping, catch-up or con-
vergence? Europe in a comparative global context. Journal of
European Social Policy 10 (2): 99–119.
Andersen, L. 2012. Organisering av prosjekterings- og byggepros-
essen. Rapport, Studio Appertura. NTNU Samfunnsforskning.
Andersen, L. 2017: Organisering av komplekse prosesser; Viten-
skapsteoretiske og filosofiske forutsetninger. Oslo: Fagbok-
forlaget.
Babson, S. 1993. Lean and mean: The MIT model and lean produc-
tion at Mazda. Labor Studies Journal 18: 3–25.
Ballard, H. G. 2000. The last planner system of production con-
trol. Birmingham: School of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham.
Bals, J. 2017. Hvem skal bygge landet? Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
Brunzina R. 1982. Art and architecture, ancient and modern.
Research in Philosophy and Technology 5: 163–87.
Ellegård, K. 2007. The creation of a new production system at the
Volvo automobile assembly plant in Uddevalla, Sweden. In
Enriching production: Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant
as an alternative to lean production (digital edition), edited
by Å. Sandberg. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Work Life
Research.
European Commission. 2011. A roadmap for moving to a compet-
itive low carbon economy in 2050. Available from www.cbss.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/EU-Low-Carbon-Road-
Map-2050.pdf.
Frey, C. B. and Osborne, M. 2013. The future of employment: How
susceptible are jobs to computerisation. Working paper, Oxford
Martin Programme on Technology and Employment.
Fyhn, H. Forthcoming. Building creatures of uncertainty: Crisis, sto-
rytelling and uncertainty in the Norwegian building industry. In
Edges of global transformation: Ethnographies of uncertainty,
edited by H. Fyhn, H. Aspen and A. K. Larsen.
Gustavsen, B. 2011. The Nordic model of work organization. Journal
of the Knowledge Economy 2 (4): 463–80.
Hultman, L. 2014 Vartannat jobb automatiseras inom 20 år - utman-
ingar för Sverige. Stockholm: Stiftelsen for strategisk forskning.
Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays in
livelihood, dwelling and skill. London and New York: Routledge.
Ingold, T. 2013. Making. London and New York: Routledge.
Ingvaldsen, J. A., Rolfsen, M. and Finsrud, H. D. 2012. Lean organise-
ring i norsk arbeidsliv: Slutten på medvirkning? Magma, Econas tidsskrif for økonomi og ledelse 4 (2012): 42–50.
Jørgensen, S. H. 2004. På pporet av improvisasjonens potensiale.
Dr.art.-avhandling, Institutt for Musikk, NTNU.
Khattak, N. G. and Sarwar, U. 2014. Lean vs tradisjonell byggemetode:
En evaluering av OiB og kunnskapssenteret. Masteroppgave,
Norges Miljø og Biolviitenskapelige Universitet, Fakulted for
Miljøvitenskap og Teknologi.
Koskela, L., 1997. Lean production in construction. In Lean con-
struction, edited by L. Alarcon, 1–9. Rotterdam and Brookfield:A. A. Balkema.
Koskela, L., Ballard, G. and Tommelein, I. 2002. The foundations of
lean construction. Design and construction – Building in value.
Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Melles, B. 1997. What do we mean by lean production in construction.
In Lean construction, edited by L. Alarcon, 24–9. Rotterdam
and Brookfield: A. A. Balkema.
Marsdal, M. E. 2015. Fra sosial dumping til sammenbrud? Bygge-
næringen i Osloregionen høsten 2015. Manifest senter for sam-
funnsanalyse: rapport nr 4/2015.
Marx, K. 1930 [1867]. Capital – A critique of political economy
(vol. 1). Edited by F. Engels. Translated by E. Paul and C. Paul.
London: Dent.
Mordal, P. 2014. Nytten av taktplanlegging – Casestudie av prosjekt
Horneberg B3. Masteropppgave, Institutt for Bygg, Anlegg og
Transport, NTNU.
Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P. and Ekeland, A. 2015. Computerization
and the future of jobs in Norway. Governmenta research
report. Available from nettsteder.regjeringen.no/fremtidenss-
kole/files/2014/05/Computerization-and-the-Future-of-Jobs-
in-Norway.pdf.
Pil, F and Fujimoto, T. 2007: Lean and reflective production: The
dynamic nature of production models. International Journal of
Production Research 45 (16): 3741–61.
Pye, D. 1968. The nature and art of workmanship. London: Herbert
Press.
Relaux, F. 1876. The kinematics of machinery: Outlines of a theory
of machines. London: Macmillan.
Ryghaug, M. and Sørensen, K. 2009. How energy efficiency fails in
the building industry. Energy Policy 37: 2009.
Røyrvik, E. 2011. The allure of capitalism: An ethnography of man-
agement and the global economy in crisis. Oxford and New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
Schwab, K. 2016. The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: Schwab.
Standing, G. 2011. The precariat: The new dangerous class. London:
Bloomsbury.
Susskind, R. and Susskind, D. 2015. The future of the professions:
How technology will transform the work of human experts.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Søraa, R. A., Ingeborgrud, L., Suboticki, I. and Solbu, G. 2017. Communities of peer practitioners experiences from an academic writing group. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology
Studies 5 (1): 30–7.
Tesfaye, M. 2013. Kloge hænder: Et forsvar for håndværk og
faglighed. Viborg: Gyldendal.
Veidekke. 2011. Involverende planlegging – I produksjon. Veidekke
entreprenør a/s.
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and
identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Whyte, S. R. 2009. Epilogue. In Dealing with uncertainty in con-
temporary African lives, edited by L. Haram and C. Bawa Jamba. Stockholm: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. and Roos, D. 2008. The machine that
changed the world. London, New York, NY, Sidney and Yorono:
Simon & Schuster.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All content in NJSTS is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. This means that anyone is free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) or adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the material as they like, provided they give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
