Abundance of brown bears and wolves in central south Norway after 1733 as revealed by bounty records
Main Article Content
Abstract
Disbursements for bounties were made locally in Norway from 1733 to 1845 for the killing of brown bears (Ursus arctos) and wolves (Canis lupus). More than 3000 bounty records of these two species from 19 parishes in central south Norway were analysed. The greatest number of bounties paid per unit of area was found in forested areas in the lowland. The number of bounties paid was positively correlated with the size of forested areas and negatively with the density of people and their wealth, represented by the number of cows per inhabitant. The gradient of the regression lines for bounties paid in relation to time in the period 1738 - 1815 was negative, even after correcting for inflation, suggesting that the bounty system caused a slow decrease in the populations of both brown bears and wolves during the 18th century. The introduction of better firearms after about 1850 led to an abrupt decline in the wolf population, which was nearly exterminated around 1870. The brown bear survived a few decades longer, but was also gradually reduced to very small numbers in the beginning of the 20th century.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).