The preference for natural sounds in an urban residential area. Effects of demographic variables
Main Article Content
Abstract
A representative sample of urban residents was asked to rate common verbally presented urban sound types along a scale of pleasantness. Three types of natural sounds (‘bird song’, ‘sounds from wind’, ‘sounds from water’) received the highest scores, followed by ‘silence’, and ‘sounds from children playing’. Mechanical sounds (‘lawn mowers’ and traffic) and ‘dog barking’ were rated as moderately unpleasant. Differences across demographic groups were small. However, significant positive associations emerged between the rating of natural sounds and age, and educational level. Women more than men, rated natural sounds to be pleasant. Rating of mechanical sounds did not vary across demographic groups. Women more than men, and respondents with children in the household more than other respondents, rated ‘sounds from children playing’ as pleasant. The results are consistent with previous research on attitudes toward animals, and on adults’ responsiveness to children. The value assigned by urban residents to natural sounds should instigate urban planners to pay more attention to the conservation of animals and their habitat.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).