Papirløses rett til å søke arbeid. En konsekvensetisk vurdering

Författare

  • Lars Fr. H. Svendsen Institutt for filosofi og førstesemesterstudier, Universitetet i Bergen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v6i2.1783

Nyckelord:

asylum seekers, work, liberal democracy, consequentialism

Abstract

Artikkelen vurderer hvorvidt ID-kravet, som begrenser asylsøkeres anledning til å søke arbeid, er etisk velbegrunnet innenfor rammene av en liberal rettskultur. Videre anlegges et konsekvensetisk perspektiv fordi ID-kravet er konsekvensetisk begrunnet, og det kan da foretas en immanent kritikk. Det vises at ID-kravet innebærer en begrensning av asylsøkeres negative og positive frihet, og at forsvarere av ID-kravet dermed må bevise at kravet har så gode konsekvenser at det legitimerer en slik begrensning av asylsøkeres frihet. Både generelle overveielser av ID-kravets fordeler og ulemper og konkrete data tilsier at bevisbyrden ikke er oppfylt. Følgelig må det enten frembringes empiri som tilsier at ID-kravet likevel har bedre konsekvenser, eller det bør gis en annen type begrunnelse enn den konsekvensetiske for ID-kravet, eller ID-kravet bør avskaffes.

Nøkkelord: asylsøkere, arbeid, liberalt demokrati, konsekvensialisme

English summary: Undocumented migrants' right to apply for work. A consequentialist assessment

The article evaluates whether the Norwegian ID-demand, which limits asylum seekers' opportunity for work, is ethically well founded within the limits of a liberal, legal culture. The argument operates within a consequentialist normative theory because the ID-demand is justified in terms of its consequences, and an immanent critique of the demand can therefore be carried out. It is argued that the ID-demand imposes restrictions on the negative and positive liberty of asylum seekers, and defenders of the ID-demand will then have a burden of proof to show that the demand has such good consequences that it will legitimise these restrictions. Both general considerations and specific data clearly indicate that this burden of proof is not satisfied. Hence, one must either provide new data that indicate that the ID-demand after all has better consequences, defend the ID-demand in terms of something other than its consequences or reject the ID-demand.

Nedladdningar

Nedladdningsdata är inte tillgängliga än.
EiP 2/2012

##submission.downloads##

Publicerad

2012-11-13

Referera så här

Svendsen, L. F. H. (2012). Papirløses rett til å søke arbeid. En konsekvensetisk vurdering. Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 6(2), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v6i2.1783

Nummer

Nr 2 (2012)

Sektion

Artikler - Articles

Licens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).