Evidensbaseret eller menigheden af «ikke-troende»? Tilsvar fra John Brodersen, Peter Laurs Sørensen, Fía Lindenskov og Lonny Henriksen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v3i1.1714Abstract
I sin udmærkede kommentar til vores artikel «En etisk diskussion af screening for kræftsygdomme» beskriver Geir Hoff den udtalte mangel på evidens vedrørende nytteværdien af screeningsprogrammer for kræftsygdomme baseret på randomiserede studier. Ydermere fremhæver Geir Hoff misforholdet mellem den manglende evidens ved screening og de strenge krav, der er til evidensen i den farmaceutiske industri. Dette er en velkommen kritik, pga. en udtalt ukritisk og uvidenskabelig tilgang til anvendelse af screening for denne eller hin sygdom eller risikofaktor.
Nedladdningar
Nedladdningsdata är inte tillgängliga än.
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
2009-05-01
Referera så här
Brodersen, J., Sørensen, P. L., Lindenskov, F., & Henriksen, L. (2009). Evidensbaseret eller menigheden af «ikke-troende»? Tilsvar fra John Brodersen, Peter Laurs Sørensen, Fía Lindenskov og Lonny Henriksen. Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 3(1), 86-88. https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v3i1.1714
Nummer
Sektion
Åpen del - Open section
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
