Critical remarks on Religion in the public sphere' – Habermas between Kant and Kierkegaard

Författare

  • Roe Fremstedal Department of Philosophy, NTNU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v3i1.1707

Nyckelord:

rationality, religion, truth claims, universality, validity claims

Abstract

This article provides a critical assessment of Habermas's recent work on religion and the role of religion in the public sphere by comparing it to Kant's philosophy of religion on the one hand and that of Kierkegaard on the other. It is argued that although Habermas is in many ways a Kantian, he diverges from Kant when it comes to religion, by taking a position which comes closer to the Kierkegaardian view that religiousness belongs to private faith rather than philosophy. This has implications not just for the conception of religion but also for the very roles of communication, validity, rationality, and philosophy.

Nedladdningar

Nedladdningsdata är inte tillgängliga än.
EiP 1/2009

##submission.downloads##

Publicerad

2009-05-01

Referera så här

Fremstedal, R. (2009). Critical remarks on Religion in the public sphere’ – Habermas between Kant and Kierkegaard. Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 3(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v3i1.1707

Nummer

Nr 1 (2009)

Sektion

Artikler - Articles

Licens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).