Et forsvar for provoserende filosofi

Forfattere

  • Aksel Braanen Sterri University of Oslo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v12i2.2539

Sammendrag

En uttalelse om at personer med Downs syndrom ikke kan leve fullverdige liv, satte i gang en stor og opphetet debatt i den norske offentligheten i 2017. Denne ga opphav til en mer overordnet debatt om hva akademikere bør og ikke bør si i offentligheten. En viss form for offentlig filosofi, det jeg vil kalle provokativ offentlig filosofi, er blitt utpekt som synder. I denne artikkelen vil jeg, med utgangspunkt i debatten om fullverdige liv, forsvare provokativ offentlig filosofi mot både epistemiske og etiske innvendinger.

Nøkkelord: Filosofisk argumentasjon, offentlig debatt, offentlig filosofi, sorteringssamfunnet, Downs syndrom, fullverdige liv, eugenikk

English summary: Provocative Public Philosophy

In 2017, I argued that people with Down syndrome cannot live full lives. This sparked a heated debated in the Norwegian public sphere. This gave rise to a debate over what academics should and should not say in public. A certain form of public philosophy, what I will call provocative public philosophy, was criticized for being harmful, imperialistic, for eroding trust in philosophers, and for creating too much noise. In this article I will, in light of the Down syndrome debate, defend provocative public philosophy against these allegations. 

Keywords: Philosophical argumentation, public debate, public philosophy, Down syndrome, eugenics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Forfatterbiografi

Aksel Braanen Sterri, University of Oslo

Institutt for filosofi, ide- og kunsthistorie og klassiske språk, akselbst@ifikk.uio.no

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2018-11-12

Hvordan referere

Sterri, A. B. (2018). Et forsvar for provoserende filosofi. Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 12(2), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v12i2.2539

Utgave

Nr 2 (2018)

Seksjon

Åpen del - Open section

Lisens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).