Å leve et menneskeverdig liv - Martha Nussbaums globale helseetikk

Forfattere

  • Odin Lysaker Associate Professor of Ethics, University of Agder, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v9i2.1871

Emneord (Nøkkelord):

Menneskeverd, menneskerettigheter, global helseetikk, Martha Nussbaum

Sammendrag

Nylig igangsatte FN Post-2015, sin nye utviklingsagenda. Sentralt er en global kamp for bedret helse, hvor det å leve et menneskeverdig liv står i sentrum. Imidlertid er forståelsen av selve helsebegrepet omstridt. Noen mener at det bør knyttes an til jus og menneskerettigheter, mens andre foreslår etikk og menneskeverd. Dette hviler i sin tur på motstridende menneskesyn i den globale helseetiske diskursen, nemlig mennesket som enten autonomt eller avhengig. I artikkelen analyserer jeg denne debatten ut fra det jeg hevder er Martha Nussbaums globale helseetikk, som baseres på hennes kapabilitetstilnærming så vel som begrep om ‘helse som livskvalitet’. Min konklusjon er at Nussbaums normative begrunnelse for Post-2015 ut fra et kroppslig forankret menneskeverd er det mest overbevisende av de to konkurrerende svarene.

Nøkkelord: global helseetikk, Martha Nussbaum, menneskeverd, menneskerettigheter, post-2015

English summary: Living a dignified life - Martha Nussbaum's global health ethics

The UN recently launched Post-2015, which is its new development agenda. Central here is the global struggle for improved health, in which what it takes to live a dignified life is stressed. However, the understanding of the notion of health is disputed. Some believe that it should be linked to law and the human rights, while others suggest ethics and human dignity. Which in turn rests on conflicting stands in the global health ethical discourse regards to the view of humanity, namely either as autonomous or dependent. In the paper I analyse this discourse, in which my point of departure is Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach as well as her concept of health as life quality. This I read exactly as a global health ethics. Thus, I conclude that between the two competing answers, Nussbaum’s normative justification for Post-2015 on the basis of bodily grounded human dignity is the most convincing.

Keywords: global health ethics, Martha Nussbaum, human dignity, human rights, Post-2015

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Forfatterbiografi

Odin Lysaker, Associate Professor of Ethics, University of Agder, Norway

Associate Professor
Åpent nummer om profesjonsetikk

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2015-11-09

Hvordan referere

Lysaker, O. (2015). Å leve et menneskeverdig liv - Martha Nussbaums globale helseetikk. Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 9(2), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v9i2.1871

Utgave

Nr 2 (2015)

Seksjon

Artikler - Articles

Lisens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).