Stakeholder Inclusion as the Research Council of Norway’s Silver Bullet

Abstract

Focusing on stakeholder inclusion, this article investigates the consequences of implementing the responsible research and innovation framework in a public funding regime. I use a Norwegian transdisciplinary project as a case study, demonstrating how the Research Council of Norway relies heavily on the assumption that stakeholders will pay for further development of the project as long as they are appropriately engaged. In analysing my case, I show how a real risk exists for a project that can potentially deliver value to society and address the grand challenges of our time ends up as waste. I refer to this as 4E Waste which I break into four types:

• Economic Waste – when money put into the initial project becomes “worthless” because the research is not followed up,
• Eidetic Waste – where knowledge is lost when the community of practice that is building the novel understanding dissipates,
• Ecological Waste – when polluting practices associated with current production methods prevail, and
• Ethical Waste – when the potential enterprise becomes a missed chance to do something good.

Keywords: RRI; stakeholder inclusion; funding policy; Mode 2 research