Three interpretations of the association between birth weight and cardiovascular disease
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v15i1.225Abstract
Most epidemiological studies of cardiovascular disease have had a focus on smoking, blood pressure, diet, physical activity and obesity in adulthood as determinants of cardiovascular disease. A few studies from the 1970s and onwards attempted to shed light on the early origins of this disease, and it is now established through cohort studies that there is a fairly strong and consistent relationship between low birth weight and increased risk of later cardiovascular disease. However, the interpretation of this relationship is under discussion. Three alternative interpretations of the association are discussed. The first interpretation, the environmental causal model, claims that the external influences on the growth of fetal organ systems have detrimental biological consequences that predispose the child for cardiovascular disease as an adult. This is the fetal programming hypothesis, which presently more often is called the theory of developmental plasticity, integrating environmental events before and after birth. The second interpretation, the genetic confounding model, says that the association between low birth weight and later cardiovascular disease is not causal. The association is due to confounding by pleiotropic genes, i.e. genes that influence more than one phenotype. The third interpretation, the environmental confounding model, says that lifestyles and general socioeconomic conditions that correlate across generations cause both low birth weight and predisposes for cardiovascular disease, and thereby leads to a spurious association. The conclusion is that, with the studies reported up to now, one cannot dismiss any of these interpretations. By utilizing the large pregnancy cohorts set up in Norway and other countries, these models can be put to critical tests.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Norsk Epidemiologi licenses all content of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) licence. This means, among other things, that anyone is free to copy and distribute the content, as long as they give proper credit to the author(s) and the journal. For further information, see Creative Commons website for human readable or lawyer readable versions.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).